Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23304364›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2012

Sim•TwentyFive: an interactive visualization system for data-driven decision support.

Brendan Stubbs, David C Kale, Amar Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Innovative information visualization of electronic health record data: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Plexlines: Tracking Socio-communicative Behaviors Using Timeline Visualizations.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brendan StubbsStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
David C Kale
Amar Das

Funding

Advanced Computational Framework for Decision Support in Critically Ill ChildrenRC1LM010639 · NLM · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI WETZEL, RANDALL C · 2009 to 2010
$990k
NLM NIH HHS RC1 LM010639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinicians at the bedside are increasingly overwhelmed by an inundation of information and must rely largely on pattern recognition and professional experience to comprehend complex clinical data and treat their patients in a timely manner. Traditional decision support systems are based on rules and predictive models and often fail to take advantage of increasingly large digital clinical data stores available in real-time. We propose an alternative approach to delivering data-driven decision support based on an interactive system for exploring and visualizing a context of physiologically similar patients from a database. Here we present Sim•TwentyFive, a highly flexible, responsive, intuitive prototype with a comprehensive set of interaction techniques that effectively reduces the cognitive burden of querying, exploring, analyzing and comparing similar past patient episodes. Quantitative performance tests and anonymous summative evaluations from PICU physicians indicated that Sim•TwentyFive is an efficient, intuitive and clinically-useful tool.

Indexed as

Computer GraphicsDecision Support Systems, ClinicalElectronic Health RecordsAttitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to ComputersDecision Support TechniquesHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricMonitoring, PhysiologicPoint-of-Care SystemsUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID23304364
PMCPMC3540525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.