Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23304342›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2012

Using a service oriented architecture approach to clinical decision support: performance results from two CDS Consortium demonstrations.

Marilyn D Paterno, Howard S Goldberg, Linas Simonaitis, Brian E Dixon, Adam Wright, Beatriz H Rocha, Harley Z Ramelson, Blackford Middleton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Clinical decision support alert malfunctions: analysis and empirically derived taxonomy.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
  5. Consolidating CCDs from multiple data sources: a modular approach.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marilyn D PaternoClinical Informatics R&D, Partners HealthCare System, Inc., Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Howard S Goldberg
Linas Simonaitis
Brian E Dixon
Adam Wright
Beatriz H Rocha
Harley Z Ramelson
Blackford Middleton

Funding

PHS HHS HHSA-290-2008-10010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Clinical Decision Support Consortium has completed two demonstration trials involving a web service for the execution of clinical decision support (CDS) rules in one or more electronic health record (EHR) systems. The initial trial ran in a local EHR at Partners HealthCare. A second EHR site, associated with Wishard Memorial Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, was added in the second trial. Data were gathered during each 6 month period and analyzed to assess performance, reliability, and response time in the form of means and standard deviations for all technical components of the service, including assembling and preparation of input data. The mean service call time for each period was just over 2 seconds. In this paper we report on the findings and analysis to date while describing the areas for further analysis and optimization as we continue to expand our use of a Services Oriented Architecture approach for CDS across multiple institutions.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedPractice Guidelines as TopicElectronic Health RecordsHumansInternetUnited StatesUnited States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Identifiers

PMID23304342
PMCPMC3540488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.