Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23304315›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2012

Clinical information system services and capabilities desired for scalable, standards-based, service-oriented decision support: consensus assessment of the Health Level 7 clinical decision support Work Group.

Kensaku Kawamoto, Jason Jacobs, Brandon M Welch, Vojtech Huser, Marilyn D Paterno, Guilherme Del Fiol, David Shields, Howard R Strasberg, Peter J Haug, Zhijing Liu and 6 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical decision support alert malfunctions: analysis and empirically derived taxonomy.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
  6. A model to support shared decision making in electronic health records systems.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2014
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kensaku KawamotoUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jason Jacobs
Brandon M Welch
Vojtech Huser
Marilyn D Paterno
Guilherme Del Fiol
David Shields
Howard R Strasberg
Peter J Haug
Zhijing Liu
Robert A Jenders
David W Rowed
Daryl Chertcoff
Karsten Fehre
Klaus-Peter Adlassnig
A Clayton Curtis

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH MEDICAL INFORMATICS TRAININGT15LM007124 · NLM · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Karen Louise Eilbeck · 1997 to 2026
$22.0M
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE-UL1: BPCAUL1RR025764 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2008 to 2011
$19.4M
Context-Aware Knowledge Delivery into Electronic Health RecordsK01HS018352 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DEL FIOL, GUILHERME · 2009 to 2012
$568k
AHRQ HHS K01 HS018352AHRQ HHS K01HS018352NCRR NIH HHS 5UL1RR025764-02NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025764NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007124NLM NIH HHS T15LM007124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A standards-based, service-oriented architecture for clinical decision support (CDS) has the potential to significantly enhance CDS scalability and robustness. To enable such a CDS architecture, the Health Level 7 CDS Work Group reviewed the literature, hosted multi-stakeholder discussions, and consulted domain experts to identify and prioritize the services and capabilities required from clinical information systems (CISs) to enable service-oriented CDS. In addition, relevant available standards were identified. Through this process, ten CIS services and eight CIS capabilities were identified as being important for enabling scalable, service-oriented CDS. In particular, through a survey of 46 domain experts, five services and capabilities were identified as being especially critical: 1) the use of standard information models and terminologies; 2) the ability to leverage a Decision Support Service (DSS); 3) support for a clinical data query service; 4) support for an event subscription and notification service; and 5) support for a user communication service.

Indexed as

Health Level SevenDecision Support Systems, ClinicalHealth Information ManagementInformation SystemsMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedMEDLINESoftware

Identifiers

PMID23304315
PMCPMC3540445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.