Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23304292›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2012

Impact of selective mapping strategies on automated laboratory result notification to public health authorities.

Roland E Gamache, Brian E Dixon, Shaun Grannis, Daniel J Vreeman

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A multi-part matching strategy for mapping LOINC with laboratory terminologies.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roland E GamacheRegenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Brian E Dixon
Shaun Grannis
Daniel J Vreeman
Regenstrief Institute · US

Funding

Improving Population Health Through Enhanced Targeted Regional Decision SupportR01HS020909 · AHRQ · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DIXON, BRIAN E. · 2011 to 2015
$2.0M
AHRQ HHS 5R01HS0118553AHRQ HHS R01 HS020909NLM NIH HHS HHSN276200800006CPHITPO CDC HHS 1P01HK000077-01PHITPO CDC HHS P01 HK000077PHS HHS HHSN2762008000006C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated electronic laboratory reporting (ELR) for public health has many potential advantages, but requires mapping local laboratory test codes to a standard vocabulary such as LOINC. Mapping only the most frequently reported tests provides one way to prioritize the effort and mitigate the resource burden. We evaluated the implications of selective mapping on ELR for public health by comparing reportable conditions from an operational ELR system with the codes in the LOINC Top 2000. Laboratory result codes in the LOINC Top 2000 accounted for 65.3% of the reportable condition volume. However, by also including the 129 most frequent LOINC codes that identified reportable conditions in our system but were not present in the LOINC Top 2000, this set would cover 98% of the reportable condition volume. Our study highlights the ways that our approach to implementing vocabulary standards impacts secondary data uses such as public health reporting.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory Information SystemsLogical Observation Identifiers Names and CodesMandatory ReportingPublic Health AdministrationComputer Communication NetworksElectronic Data ProcessingHumansIndiana

Identifiers

PMID23304292
PMCPMC3540490
OpenAlexW13736971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.