ArticleClinical & developmental immunology2012
Validation of cytomegalovirus immune competence assays for the characterization of CD8(+) T cell responses posttransplant.
Article in Clinical & developmental immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic usefulness of the cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T cell-based assay for predicting CMV infection after kidney transplant.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2020Observational
- Dextramer reagents are effective tools for quantifying CMV antigen-specific T cells from peripheral blood samples.Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry · 2015Article
- Identification and validation of shrimp-tropomyosin specific CD4 T cell epitopes.Human immunology · 2013Article
- Comparison of cytomegalovirus (CMV) enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot and CMV quantiferon gamma interferon-releasing assays in assessing risk of CMV infection in kidney transplant recipients.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is one of the most important infectious complications of transplantation. Monitoring CMV-specific CD8 T cell immunity is useful for predicting active CMV infection and for directing targeted antiviral therapy. In this study, we examined four basic parameters for validation of CMV-specific tetramer staining and peptide stimulation assays that cover five most frequent HLA class I alleles. We also examined the potential use of CMV-specific CD8(+) T cell numbers and functional and cytolytic responses in two autologous HSCT recipients treated for multiple myeloma. The coefficient of variation (CV %) of the precision within assays was 3.1-24% for HLA-tetramer staining, 2.5-47% for IFN-γ, and 3.4-59.7% for CD107a/b production upon peptide stimulation. The precision between assays was 5-26% for tetramer staining, 4-24% for IFN-γ, and 5-48% for CD107a/b. The limit of detection was 0.1-0.23 cells/μL of blood for tetramer staining, 0-0.23 cell/μL for IFN-γ, and 0.11-0.98 cells/μL for CD107a/b. The assays were linear and specific. The reference interval with 95% confidence level was 0-18 cells/μL for tetramer staining, 0-2 cells/μL for IFN-γ, and 0-3 cells/μL for CD107a/b. Our results provide acceptable measures of test performance for CMV immune competence assays for the characterization of CD8(+) T cell responses posttransplant measured in the absolute cell count per μL of blood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.