Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23303107›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2013

Epidemiology of two large measles virus outbreaks in Catalonia: what a difference the month of administration of the first dose of vaccine makes.

Núria Torner, Andres Anton, Irene Barrabeig, Sara Lafuente, Ignasi Parron, César Arias, Neus Camps, Josep Costa, Ana Martínez, Roser Torra and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Etiological analysis of discarded measles in the context of a measles outbreak among a highly immunized population.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society · 2023
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Measles outbreak in Dubrovnik-Neretva County, Croatia, May to June 2018.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2020
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Implication of health care personnel in measles transmission.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Núria TornerPublic Health Agency of Catalonia; Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP); Carlos III Institute; Madrid, Spain; Department of Public Health; University of Barcelona; Barcelona, Spain.
Andres Anton
Irene Barrabeig
Sara Lafuente
Ignasi Parron
César Arias
Neus Camps
Josep Costa
Ana Martínez
Roser Torra
Pere Godoy
Sofia Minguell
Glòria Ferrús
Carmen Cabezas
Ángela Domínguez
Measles Elimination Program Surveillance Network of Catalonia, Spain
Spain

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measles cases in the European Region have been increasing in the last decade; this illustrates the challenge of what we are now encountering in the form of pediatric preventable diseases. In Catalonia, autochthonous measles was declared eliminated in the year 2000 as the result of high measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) coverage for first and second dose (15 mo and 4 y) since the mid-1990s. From then on, sporadic imported cases and small outbreaks appeared, until in 2006-2007 a large measles outbreak affecting mostly unvaccinated toddlers hit the Barcelona Health Region. Consequently, in January 2008, first dose administration of MMR was lowered from 15 to 12 mo of age. A new honeymoon period went by until the end of 2010, when several importations of cases triggered new sustained transmission of different wild measles virus genotypes, but this time striking young adults. The aim of this study is to show the effect of a change in MMR vaccination schedule policy, and the difference in age incidence and hospitalization rates of affected individuals between both outbreaks.   Epidemiologic data were obtained by case interviews and review of medical records. Samples for virological confirmation and genotyping of cases were collected as established in the Measles Elimination plan guidelines. Incidence rate (IR), rate ratio (RR) and their 95% CI and hospitalization rate (HR) by age group were determined. Statistic z was used for comparing proportions. Total number of confirmed cases was 305 in the 2010 outbreak and 381 in the 2006-2007 outbreak; mean age 20 y (SD 14.8 y; 3 mo to 51 y) vs. 15 mo (SD 13.1 y; 1 mo to 50 y). Highest proportion of cases was set in ≥ 25 y (47%) vs. 24.2% in 2006 (p < 0.001). Differences in IR for ≤ 15 mo (49/100,000 vs. 278.2/100,000; RR: 3,9; 95%CI 2,9-5.4) and in overall HR 29.8% vs. 15.7% were all statistically significant (p < 0.001). The change of the month of age for the administration of the first MMR dose proved successful to protect infants. Yet, given the current epidemiological situation, continued awareness and efforts to reach young adult population, especially those at high risk of infection and transmission such as healthcare workers and travelers, are needed to stop the spread of the virus when importations occur.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksImmunization ScheduleAdolescentAdultAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGenotypeHospitalizationHumansIncidenceInfantMaleMeaslesMeasles VaccineMeasles Vaccineeliminationgenotypemeaslesoutbreakvaccination coverage

Identifiers

PMID23303107
PMCPMC3891728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.