Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23303072›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2013

Systemic administration of 8-OH-DPAT and eticlopride, but not SCH23390, alters loss-chasing behavior in the rat.

Robert D Rogers, Adeline Wong, Chris McKinnon, Catharine A Winstanley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Exploring preferences for variable delays over fixed delays to high-value food rewards as a model of food-seeking behaviours in humans.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  3. Feeding behaviour, risk-sensitivity and response control: effects of 5-HTPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  4. Understanding Addiction Using Animal Models.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gambling disorder: an integrative review of animal and human studies.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Dopamine D3 Receptors Modulate the Ability of Win-Paired Cues to Increase Risky Choice in a Rat Gambling Task.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert D RogersDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. robert.rogers@psych.ox.ac.uk
Adeline Wong
Chris McKinnon
Catharine A Winstanley
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council S20137CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gambling to recover losses is a common gaming behavior. In a clinical context, however, this phenomenon mediates the relationship between diminished control over gambling and the adverse socioeconomic consequences of gambling problems. Modeling loss-chasing through analogous behaviors in rats could facilitate its pharmacological investigation as a potential therapeutic target. Here, rats were trained to make operant responses that produced both food rewards, and unpredictably, imminent time-out periods in which rewards would be unavailable. At these decision points, rats were offered choices between waiting for these time-out periods to elapse before resuming responding for rewards ('quit' responses), or selecting risky options with a 0.5 probability of avoiding the time-outs altogether and a 0.5 probability of time-out periods twice as long as signaled originally ('chase' responses). Chasing behavior, and the latencies to chase or quit, during sequences of unfavorable outcomes were tested following systemic administration of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT, the D2 receptor antagonist, eticlopride, and the D1 receptor antagonist, SCH23390. 8-OH-DPAT and eticlopride significantly reduced the proportion of chase responses, and the mean number of consecutive chase responses, in a dose-dependent manner. 8-OH-DPAT also increased latencies to chase. Increasing doses of eticlopride first speeded, then slowed, latencies to quit while SCH23390 had no significant effects on any measure. Research is needed to identify the precise cognitive mechanisms mediating these kinds of risky choices in rats. However, our data provide the first experimental demonstration that 5-HT1A and D2, but not D1, receptor activity influence a behavioral analog of loss-chasing in rats.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, Psychology8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralinAnimalsBenzazepinesDopamine AntagonistsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsMalePsychomotor PerformanceRatsRats, Long-EvansReaction TimeReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2Salicylamides8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralinBenzazepinesDopamine AntagonistsDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistseticloprideReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2SalicylamidesSCH 23390

Identifiers

PMID23303072
PMCPMC3629409
OpenAlexW2062718863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.