Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23302801›Full record

ArticleNature2013

Negligible immunogenicity of terminally differentiated cells derived from induced pluripotent or embryonic stem cells.

Ryoko Araki, Masahiro Uda, Yuko Hoki, Misato Sunayama, Miki Nakamura, Shunsuke Ando, Mayumi Sugiura, Hisashi Ideno, Akemi Shimada, Akira Nifuji and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 262 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
262citing papers in PubMed
39.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

262 citing papers in PubMed, 496 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. 3D epigenomic landscape of the human retinal pigment epithelium.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Pluripotent stem cell-based approaches for heart repair and the potential of genetic modifications.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Personalized Stem Cell-Based Regeneration in Spinal Cord Injury Care.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

202 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryoko ArakiTranscriptome Research Group, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.
Masahiro Uda
Yuko Hoki
Misato Sunayama
Miki Nakamura
Shunsuke Ando
Mayumi Sugiura
Hisashi Ideno
Akemi Shimada
Akira Nifuji
Masumi Abe
Tsurumi University · JPJapan Science and Technology Agency · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advantages of using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) instead of embryonic stem (ES) cells in regenerative medicine centre around circumventing concerns about the ethics of using ES cells and the likelihood of immune rejection of ES-cell-derived tissues. However, partial reprogramming and genetic instabilities in iPSCs could elicit immune responses in transplant recipients even when iPSC-derived differentiated cells are transplanted. iPSCs are first differentiated into specific types of cells in vitro for subsequent transplantation. Although model transplantation experiments have been conducted using various iPSC-derived differentiated tissues and immune rejections have not been observed, careful investigation of the immunogenicity of iPSC-derived tissue is becoming increasingly critical, especially as this has not been the focus of most studies done so far. A recent study reported immunogenicity of iPSC- but not ES-cell-derived teratomas and implicated several causative genes. Nevertheless, some controversy has arisen regarding these findings. Here we examine the immunogenicity of differentiated skin and bone marrow tissues derived from mouse iPSCs. To ensure optimal comparison of iPSCs and ES cells, we established ten integration-free iPSC and seven ES-cell lines using an inbred mouse strain, C57BL/6. We observed no differences in the rate of success of transplantation when skin and bone marrow cells derived from iPSCs were compared with ES-cell-derived tissues. Moreover, we observed limited or no immune responses, including T-cell infiltration, for tissues derived from either iPSCs or ES cells, and no increase in the expression of the immunogenicity-causing Zg16 and Hormad1 genes in regressing skin and teratoma tissues. Our findings suggest limited immunogenicity of transplanted cells differentiated from iPSCs and ES cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone MarrowBone Marrow CellsBone Marrow TransplantationCell Cycle ProteinsCell DifferentiationEmbryonic Stem CellsGene Expression ProfilingInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMaleMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSkinSkin TransplantationTeratomaCell Cycle ProteinsMembrane ProteinsNohma protein, mouseZG-16 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID23302801
OpenAlexW2152793450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.