Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23301010›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Effects of sensory behavioral tasks on pain threshold and cortical excitability.

Magdalena Sarah Volz, Vanessa Suarez-Contreras, Mariana E Mendonca, Fernando Santos Pinheiro, Lotfi B Merabet, Felipe Fregni

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. [Holistic treatment of endometriosis].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Magdalena Sarah VolzLaboratory of Neuromodulation, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Vanessa Suarez-Contreras
Mariana E Mendonca
Fernando Santos Pinheiro
Lotfi B Merabet
Felipe Fregni
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital · US

Funding

Investigation and treatment of central nervous system dysfunction in chronic pelvR21DK081773 · NIDDK · SPAULDING REHABILITATION HOSPITAL · PI FREGNI, FELIPE · 2009 to 2010
$475k
NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK081773NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK081773-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveTranscutaneous electrical stimulation has been proven to modulate nervous system activity, leading to changes in pain perception, via the peripheral sensory system, in a bottom up approach. We tested whether different sensory behavioral tasks induce significant effects in pain processing and whether these changes correlate with cortical plasticity. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThis randomized parallel designed experiment included forty healthy right-handed males. Three different somatosensory tasks, including learning tasks with and without visual feedback and simple somatosensory input, were tested on pressure pain threshold and motor cortex excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Sensory tasks induced hand-specific pain modulation effects. They increased pain thresholds of the left hand (which was the target to the sensory tasks) and decreased them in the right hand. TMS showed that somatosensory input decreased cortical excitability, as indexed by reduced MEP amplitudes and increased SICI. Although somatosensory tasks similarly altered pain thresholds and cortical excitability, there was no significant correlation between these variables and only the visual feedback task showed significant somatosensory learning. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Lack of correlation between cortical excitability and pain thresholds and lack of differential effects across tasks, but significant changes in pain thresholds suggest that analgesic effects of somatosensory tasks are not primarily associated with motor cortical neural mechanisms, thus, suggesting that subcortical neural circuits and/or spinal cord are involved with the observed effects. Identifying the neural mechanisms of somatosensory stimulation on pain may open novel possibilities for combining different targeted therapies for pain control.

Indexed as

Pain ThresholdAdolescentAdultCerebral CortexElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, MotorHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityPain PerceptionPerceptionSomatosensory CortexTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID23301010
PMCPMC3536816
OpenAlexW2112447679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.