Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23300782›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

In vivo imaging enables high resolution preclinical trials on patients' leukemia cells growing in mice.

Nadia Terziyska, Catarina Castro Alves, Volker Groiss, Katja Schneider, Katarina Farkasova, Manfred Ogris, Ernst Wagner, Harald Ehrhardt, Renier J Brentjens, Udo zur Stadt and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Nadia TerziyskaDepartment of Gene Vectors, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany.
Catarina Castro Alves
Volker Groiss
Katja Schneider
Katarina Farkasova
Manfred Ogris
Ernst Wagner
Harald Ehrhardt
Renier J Brentjens
Udo zur Stadt
Martin Horstmann
Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez
Irmela Jeremias
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEKinderkrebs-Zentrum Hamburg · DEMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundXenograft mouse models represent helpful tools for preclinical studies on human tumors. For modeling the complexity of the human disease, primary tumor cells are by far superior to established cell lines. As qualified exemplary model, patients' acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells reliably engraft in mice inducing orthotopic disseminated leukemia closely resembling the disease in men. Unfortunately, disease monitoring of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in mice is hampered by lack of a suitable readout parameter. DESIGN AND

methodsPatients' acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells were lentivirally transduced to express the membrane-bound form of Gaussia luciferase. In vivo imaging was established in individual patients' leukemias and extensively validated.

resultsBioluminescence in vivo imaging enabled reliable and continuous follow-up of individual mice. Light emission strictly correlated to post mortem quantification of leukemic burden and revealed a logarithmic, time and cell number dependent growth pattern. Imaging conveniently quantified frequencies of leukemia initiating cells in limiting dilution transplantation assays. Upon detecting a single leukemia cell within more than 10,000 bone marrow cells, imaging enabled monitoring minimal residual disease, time to tumor re-growth and relapse. Imaging quantified therapy effects precisely and with low variances, discriminating treatment failure from partial and complete responses.

conclusionsFor the first time, we characterized in detail how in vivo imaging reforms preclinical studies on patient-derived tumors upon increasing monitoring resolution. In the future, in vivo imaging will enable performing precise preclinical studies on a broad range of highly demanding clinical challenges, such as treatment failure, resistance in leukemia initiating cells, minimal residual disease and relapse.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell TrackingChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGene ExpressionHumansInfantLuciferasesMaleMiceMice, SCIDPrecision MedicinePrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAntineoplastic AgentsLuciferasesRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23300782
PMCPMC3534096
OpenAlexW2128296734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.