Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23300656›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Multi-tissue microarray analysis identifies a molecular signature of regeneration.

Sarah E Mercer, Chia-Ho Cheng, Donald L Atkinson, Jennifer Krcmery, Claudia E Guzman, David T Kent, Katherine Zukor, Kenneth A Marx, Shannon J Odelberg, Hans-Georg Simon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Transcriptome Profiling of Osteoblasts in a Medaka (Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Mechanisms of urodele limb regeneration.Regeneration (Oxford, England) · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarah E MercerDepartment of Pediatrics, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine and Children's Memorial Research Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Chia-Ho Cheng
Donald L Atkinson
Jennifer Krcmery
Claudia E Guzman
David T Kent
Katherine Zukor
Kenneth A Marx
Shannon J Odelberg
Hans-Georg Simon

Funding

CELLULAR &MOLECULAR BASIS OF DISEASE TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008061 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI CARTHEW, RICHARD W. · 1985 to 2022
$17.1M
TRAINING IN CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCHT32HL007576 · NHLBI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Stavros George Drakos, Robin M Shaw · 1985 to 2026
$10.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS 5T32 HL07576NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007576NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008061NIGMS NIH HHS T-32 GM008061-27
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inability to functionally repair tissues that are lost as a consequence of disease or injury remains a significant challenge for regenerative medicine. The molecular and cellular processes involved in complete restoration of tissue architecture and function are expected to be complex and remain largely unknown. Unlike humans, certain salamanders can completely regenerate injured tissues and lost appendages without scar formation. A parsimonious hypothesis would predict that all of these regenerative activities are regulated, at least in part, by a common set of genes. To test this hypothesis and identify genes that might control conserved regenerative processes, we performed a comprehensive microarray analysis of the early regenerative response in five regeneration-competent tissues from the newt Notophthalmus viridescens. Consistent with this hypothesis, we established a molecular signature for regeneration that consists of common genes or gene family members that exhibit dynamic differential regulation during regeneration in multiple tissue types. These genes include members of the matrix metalloproteinase family and its regulators, extracellular matrix components, genes involved in controlling cytoskeleton dynamics, and a variety of immune response factors. Gene Ontology term enrichment analysis validated and supported their functional activities in conserved regenerative processes. Surprisingly, dendrogram clustering and RadViz classification also revealed that each regenerative tissue had its own unique temporal expression profile, pointing to an inherent tissue-specific regenerative gene program. These new findings demand a reconsideration of how we conceptualize regenerative processes and how we devise new strategies for regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

RegenerationTissue Array AnalysisAnimalsCytoskeletonImmunityNotophthalmus viridescensOrgan SpecificityReproducibility of ResultsSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID23300656
PMCPMC3530543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.