ArticlePloS one2012
RAD51 and breast cancer susceptibility: no evidence for rare variant association in the Breast Cancer Family Registry study.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- RAD51 135G>C substitution increases breast cancer risk in an ethnic-specific manner: a meta-analysis on 21,236 cases and 19,407 controls.Scientific reports · 2015Pooled it
- Germline variants of the POLH and RAD51 genes are candidate variants associated with risk of hormone receptor-negative young-onset breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Homologous Recombination Deficiency: Cancer Predispositions and Treatment Implications.The oncologist · 2021Review
- Comprehensive Functional Characterization and Clinical Interpretation of 20 Splice-Site Variants of theCancers · 2020Article
- Recent advances of therapeutic targets based on the molecular signature in breast cancer: genetic mutations and implications for current treatment paradigms.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2019Review
- Discovery of mutations in homologous recombination genes in African-American women with breast cancer.Familial cancer · 2018Article
- Multigene testing of moderate-risk genes: be mindful of the missense.Journal of medical genetics · 2016Article
- No evidence that protein truncating variants in BRIP1 are associated with breast cancer risk: implications for gene panel testing.Journal of medical genetics · 2016Article
- Genetics of breast cancer: a topic in evolution.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2015Review
- Article
- Rare mutations in RINT1 predispose carriers to breast and Lynch syndrome-spectrum cancers.Cancer discovery · 2014Article
- Rare key functional domain missense substitutions in MRE11A, RAD50, and NBN contribute to breast cancer susceptibility: results from a Breast Cancer Family Registry case-control mutation-screening study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2014Article
- EgoNet: identification of human disease ego-network modules.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Protective role of miR-155 in breast cancer through RAD51 targeting impairs homologous recombination after irradiation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Article
- Comparative transcript expression analysis of miltefosine-sensitive and miltefosine-resistant Leishmania donovani.Parasitology research · 2014Article
- Growing recognition of the role for rare missense substitutions in breast cancer susceptibility.Biomarkers in medicine · 2014Review
- Hereditary breast cancer: ever more pieces to the polygenic puzzle.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2013Article
- Article
- The Cost-Effectiveness of Multigene Panel Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Norway.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough inherited breast cancer has been associated with germline mutations in genes that are functionally involved in the DNA homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway, including BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, ATM, BRIP1, CHEK2 and PALB2, about 70% of breast cancer heritability remains unexplained. Because of their critical functions in maintaining genome integrity and already well-established associations with breast cancer susceptibility, it is likely that additional genes involved in the HRR pathway harbor sequence variants associated with increased risk of breast cancer. RAD51 plays a central biological function in DNA repair and despite the fact that rare, likely dysfunctional variants in three of its five paralogs, RAD51C, RAD51D, and XRCC2, have been associated with breast and/or ovarian cancer risk, no population-based case-control mutation screening data are available for the RAD51 gene. We thus postulated that RAD51 could harbor rare germline mutations that confer increased risk of breast cancer. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsWe screened the coding exons and proximal splice junction regions of the gene for germline sequence variation in 1,330 early-onset breast cancer cases and 1,123 controls from the Breast Cancer Family Registry, using the same population-based sampling and analytical strategy that we developed for assessment of rare sequence variants in ATM and CHEK2. In total, 12 distinct very rare or private variants were characterized in RAD51, with 10 cases (0.75%) and 9 controls (0.80%) carrying such a variant. Variants were either likely neutral missense substitutions (3), silent substitutions (4) or non-coding substitutions (5) that were predicted to have little effect on efficiency of the splicing machinery.
conclusionAltogether, our data suggest that RAD51 tolerates so little dysfunctional sequence variation that rare variants in the gene contribute little, if anything, to breast cancer susceptibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.