Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23300584›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Agonism and antagonism at the insulin receptor.

Louise Knudsen, Bo Falck Hansen, Pia Jensen, Thomas Åskov Pedersen, Kirsten Vestergaard, Lauge Schäffer, Blagoy Blagoev, Martin B Oleksiewicz, Vladislav V Kiselyov, Pierre De Meyts

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Stabilization of a protein by a single halogen-based aromatic amplifier.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Disrupting Insulin and IGF Receptor Function in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Ligand bias in receptor tyrosine kinase signaling.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Diabetes pharmacotherapy and effects on the musculoskeletal system.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Louise KnudsenReceptor Systems Biology Laboratory, Hagedorn Research Institute, Gentofte, Denmark. lsek@novonordisk.com
Bo Falck Hansen
Pia Jensen
Thomas Åskov Pedersen
Kirsten Vestergaard
Lauge Schäffer
Blagoy Blagoev
Martin B Oleksiewicz
Vladislav V Kiselyov
Pierre De Meyts
Novo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insulin can trigger metabolic as well as mitogenic effects, the latter being pharmaceutically undesirable. An understanding of the structure/function relationships between insulin receptor (IR) binding and mitogenic/metabolic signalling would greatly facilitate the preclinical development of new insulin analogues. The occurrence of ligand agonism and antagonism is well described for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and other receptors but in general, with the exception of antibodies, not for receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). In the case of the IR, no natural ligand or insulin analogue has been shown to exhibit antagonistic properties, with the exception of a crosslinked insulin dimer (B29-B'29). However, synthetic monomeric or dimeric peptides targeting sites 1 or 2 of the IR were shown to be either agonists or antagonists. We found here that the S961 peptide, previously described to be an IR antagonist, exhibited partial agonistic effects in the 1-10 nM range, showing altogether a bell-shaped dose-response curve. Intriguingly, the agonistic effects of S961 were seen only on mitogenic endpoints ((3)H-thymidine incorporation), and not on metabolic endpoints ((14)C-glucose incorporation in adipocytes and muscle cells). The agonistic effects of S961 were observed in 3 independent cell lines, with complete concordance between mitogenicity ((3)H-thymidine incorporation) and phosphorylation of the IR and Akt. Together with the B29-B'29 crosslinked dimer, S961 is a rare example of a mixed agonist/antagonist for the human IR. A plausible mechanistic explanation based on the bivalent crosslinking model of IR activation is proposed.

Indexed as

3T3-L1 CellsAdipocytesAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCHO CellsCricetinaeFemaleGlucoseHumansInsulinInsulin-Like Growth Factor IMiceMyoblastsPeptidesGlucoseInsulininsulin dimersInsulin-Like Growth Factor IPeptidesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktReceptor, IGF Type 1Receptor, InsulinS961 peptide

Identifiers

PMID23300584
PMCPMC3531387
OpenAlexW2006713818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.