ArticlePloS one2012
From understanding the development landscape of the canonical fate-switch pair to constructing a dynamic landscape for two-step neural differentiation.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative models of cell dynamics: from Neural ODEs to flow matching.Communications biology · 2026Review
- scMultiNODE: Integrative and Scalable Framework for Multi-Modal Temporal Single-Cell Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- scNODE : generative model for temporal single cell transcriptomic data prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Article
- The complex landscape of haematopoietic lineage commitments is encoded in the coarse-grained endogenous network.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- Inferring Causal Gene Regulatory Networks from Coupled Single-Cell Expression Dynamics Using Scribe.Cell systems · 2020Article
- Adaptive Landscape Shaped by Core Endogenous Network Coordinates Complex Early Progenitor Fate Commitments in Embryonic Pancreas.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- CALISTA: Clustering and LINEAGE Inference in Single-Cell Transcriptional Analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories.Nature methods · 2017Article
- A predictive computational framework for direct reprogramming between human cell types.Nature genetics · 2016Article
- Modeling the epigenetic attractors landscape: toward a post-genomic mechanistic understanding of development.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Review
- Classification of transient behaviours in a time-dependent toggle switch model.BMC systems biology · 2014Article
- Chemotactic responses of neural stem cells to SDF-1α correlate closely with their differentiation status.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent progress in stem cell biology, notably cell fate conversion, calls for novel theoretical understanding for cell differentiation. The existing qualitative concept of Waddington's "epigenetic landscape" has attracted particular attention because it captures subsequent fate decision points, thus manifesting the hierarchical ("tree-like") nature of cell fate diversification. Here, we generalized a recent work and explored such a developmental landscape for a two-gene fate decision circuit by integrating the underlying probability landscapes with different parameters (corresponding to distinct developmental stages). The change of entropy production rate along the parameter changes indicates which parameter changes can represent a normal developmental process while other parameters' change can not. The transdifferentiation paths over the landscape under certain conditions reveal the possibility of a direct and reversible phenotypic conversion. As the intensity of noise increases, we found that the landscape becomes flatter and the dominant paths more straight, implying the importance of biological noise processing mechanism in development and reprogramming. We further extended the landscape of the one-step fate decision to that for two-step decisions in central nervous system (CNS) differentiation. A minimal network and dynamic model for CNS differentiation was firstly constructed where two three-gene motifs are coupled. We then implemented the SDEs (Stochastic Differentiation Equations) simulation for the validity of the network and model. By integrating the two landscapes for the two switch gene pairs, we constructed the two-step development landscape for CNS differentiation. Our work provides new insights into cellular differentiation and important clues for better reprogramming strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.