ArticlePLoS genetics2012
An excess of gene expression divergence on the X chromosome in Drosophila embryos: implications for the faster-X hypothesis.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative single-nucleus transcriptomics reveals asymmetric evolution of the Drosophila male and female germlines.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Review
- A high-resolution crossover landscape in Drosophila santomea reveals rapid and concerted evolution of multiple properties of crossing over control.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Dichotomous transcriptome divergence at the cell-type level between thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Evolution and genetics of accessory gland transcriptome divergence between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.Genetics · 2024Article
- Meiotic, genomic and evolutionary properties of crossover distribution in Drosophila yakuba.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Intraspecific Transcriptome Variation and Sex-Biased Expression in Anopheles arabiensis.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Absence of a Faster-X Effect in Beetles (G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Evolution of an X-Linked miRNA Family Predominantly Expressed in Mammalian Male Germ Cells.Molecular biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Pleiotropy Modulates the Efficacy of Selection in Drosophila melanogaster.Molecular biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Lineage-Specific Expression Divergence in Grasses Is Associated with Male Reproduction, Host-Pathogen Defense, and Domestication.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Support for the Dominance Theory inGenetics · 2018Article
- Gene Regulation and Speciation.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2017Review
- Article
- Molecular Mechanisms and Evolutionary Processes Contributing to Accelerated Divergence of Gene Expression on the Drosophila X Chromosome.Molecular biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Sex Bias and Maternal Contribution to Gene Expression Divergence in Drosophila Blastoderm Embryos.PLoS genetics · 2015Article
- Positive Selection Underlies Faster-Z Evolution of Gene Expression in Birds.Molecular biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Complete Dosage Compensation in Anopheles stephensi and the Evolution of Sex-Biased Genes in Mosquitoes.Genome biology and evolution · 2015Article
- A Genome-wide hybrid incompatibility landscape between Caenorhabditis briggsae and C. nigoni.PLoS genetics · 2015Article
- Gene expression, chromosome heterogeneity and the fast-X effect in mammals.Biology letters · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The X chromosome is present as a single copy in the heterogametic sex, and this hemizygosity is expected to drive unusual patterns of evolution on the X relative to the autosomes. For example, the hemizgosity of the X may lead to a lower chromosomal effective population size compared to the autosomes, suggesting that the X might be more strongly affected by genetic drift. However, the X may also experience stronger positive selection than the autosomes, because recessive beneficial mutations will be more visible to selection on the X where they will spend less time being masked by the dominant, less beneficial allele--a proposal known as the faster-X hypothesis. Thus, empirical studies demonstrating increased genetic divergence on the X chromosome could be indicative of either adaptive or non-adaptive evolution. We measured gene expression in Drosophila species and in D. melanogaster inbred strains for both embryos and adults. In the embryos we found that expression divergence is on average more than 20% higher for genes on the X chromosome relative to the autosomes; but in contrast, in the inbred strains, gene expression variation is significantly lower on the X chromosome. Furthermore, expression divergence of genes on Muller's D element is significantly greater along the branch leading to the obscura sub-group, in which this element segregates as a neo-X chromosome. In the adults, divergence is greatest on the X chromosome for males, but not for females, yet in both sexes inbred strains harbour the lowest level of gene expression variation on the X chromosome. We consider different explanations for our results and conclude that they are most consistent within the framework of the faster-X hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.