ArticlePLoS computational biology2012
Chapter 9: Analyses using disease ontologies.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ontology development and use for cholangiocarcinoma risk factors and predictions: a term enrichment data analysis and machine learning classification.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2026Article
- SVM-DO: identification of tumor-discriminating mRNA signatures via support vector machines supported by Disease Ontology.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2023Article
- Generalized enrichment analysis improves the detection of adverse drug events from the biomedical literature.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- An unsupervised learning method to identify reference intervals from a clinical database.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2016Article
- Statin Intensity or Achieved LDL? Practice-based Evidence for the Evaluation of New Cholesterol Treatment Guidelines.PloS one · 2016Article
- The Saccharomyces Genome Database: Gene Product Annotation of Function, Process, and Component.Cold Spring Harbor protocols · 2015Article
- PDON: Parkinson's disease ontology for representation and modeling of the Parkinson's disease knowledge domain.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2015Article
- From Molecules to Patients: The Clinical Applications of Translational Bioinformatics.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2015Article
- Disease Ontology 2015 update: an expanded and updated database of human diseases for linking biomedical knowledge through disease data.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- MAAMD: a workflow to standardize meta-analyses and comparison of affymetrix microarray data.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Towards precision medicine: advances in computational approaches for the analysis of human variants.Journal of molecular biology · 2013Review
- The ontology of craniofacial development and malformation for translational craniofacial research.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2013Review
- Mechanistic phenotypes: an aggregative phenotyping strategy to identify disease mechanisms using GWAS data.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advanced statistical methods used to analyze high-throughput data such as gene-expression assays result in long lists of "significant genes." One way to gain insight into the significance of altered expression levels is to determine whether Gene Ontology (GO) terms associated with a particular biological process, molecular function, or cellular component are over- or under-represented in the set of genes deemed significant. This process, referred to as enrichment analysis, profiles a gene-set, and is widely used to makes sense of the results of high-throughput experiments. The canonical example of enrichment analysis is when the output dataset is a list of genes differentially expressed in some condition. To determine the biological relevance of a lengthy gene list, the usual solution is to perform enrichment analysis with the GO. We can aggregate the annotating GO concepts for each gene in this list, and arrive at a profile of the biological processes or mechanisms affected by the condition under study. While GO has been the principal target for enrichment analysis, the methods of enrichment analysis are generalizable. We can conduct the same sort of profiling along other ontologies of interest. Just as scientists can ask "Which biological process is over-represented in my set of interesting genes or proteins?" we can also ask "Which disease (or class of diseases) is over-represented in my set of interesting genes or proteins?". For example, by annotating known protein mutations with disease terms from the ontologies in BioPortal, Mort et al. recently identified a class of diseases--blood coagulation disorders--that were associated with a 14-fold depletion in substitutions at O-linked glycosylation sites. With the availability of tools for automatic annotation of datasets with terms from disease ontologies, there is no reason to restrict enrichment analyses to the GO. In this chapter, we will discuss methods to perform enrichment analysis using any ontology available in the biomedical domain. We will review the general methodology of enrichment analysis, the associated challenges, and discuss the novel translational analyses enabled by the existence of public, national computational infrastructure and by the use of disease ontologies in such analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.