Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23300354›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2012

Views of breast and colorectal cancer survivors on their routine follow-up care.

R Urquhart, A Folkes, J Babineau, E Grunfeld

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The role of the GP in follow-up cancer care: a systematic literature review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Recommendations for follow-up of colorectal cancer survivors.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Bridging the gap from the oncology setting to community care through a cross-Canada environmental scan.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2018
    Article
  16. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2018
    Article
  17. Patient Preferences for Primary Care Provider Roles in Breast Cancer Survivorship Care.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Involvement of Primary Care Physicians in the Decision Making and Care of Patients With Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R UrquhartCancer Outcomes Research Program, Cancer Care Nova Scotia, Halifax, NS.
A Folkes
J Babineau
E Grunfeld
Cancer Care Nova Scotia · CAOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur understanding of optimum health care delivery for cancer survivors is limited by the lack of a patient-centred perspective. The objectives of the present study were to explore the views of breast and colorectal cancer survivors on their routine follow-up care, with respect to needs, preferences, and quality of follow-up, and their views on cancer specialist- compared with family physician (fp)-led follow-up care.

methodsIn Nova Scotia, Canada, 23 cancer survivors (13 breast, 10 colorectal) participated in either a focus group or a one-on-one interview. Participants were asked to reflect upon their lives as cancer survivors and on the type and quality of care and support they received during the follow-up period. Each focus group or interview was transcribed verbatim, and the transcripts were audited and subjected to a thematic analysis.

resultsSIX THEMES WERE IDENTIFIED: My care is my responsibilityHow I receive information on follow-up careI have many care needsI want to be prepared and informedThe role of my fp in my cancer experience and follow-up careThe role of media Survivors often characterized the post-primary treatment experience as lacking in information and preparation for follow-up and providing inadequate support to address many of the care needs prevalent in survivor populations. Despite valuing fp participation in follow-up care, many survivors continued to receive comfort and reassurance from specialist care.

conclusionsOur findings point to the need to implement strategies that better prepare breast cancer and colorectal cancer survivors for post-treatment care and that reassure survivors of the ability of their fp to provide quality care during this period.

Indexed as

Breast cancercolorectal cancerfollow-up careoncologysurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID23300354
PMCPMC3503661
OpenAlexW2012465928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.