Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23300246›Full record

ArticlemBio2013

Broad conditions favor the evolution of phase-variable loci.

M E Palmer, M Lipsitch, E R Moxon, C D Bayliss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M E PalmerDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. mepalmer@charles.stanford.edu
M Lipsitch
E R Moxon
C D Bayliss
Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy · USStanford University · USUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Understanding and controlling antibiotic resistanceU54GM088558 · NIGMS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI LIPSITCH, MARC · 2009 to 2018
$26.4M
POPULATION GENETICS THEORYR01GM028016 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, MARCUS W · 1985 to 2010
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1 U54 GM088558NIGMS NIH HHS GM28016NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM028016NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM088558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledSimple sequence repeat (SSR) tracts produce stochastic on-off switching, or phase variation, in the expression of a panoply of surface molecules in many bacterial commensals and pathogens. A change to the number of repeats in a tract may alter the phase of the translational reading frame, which toggles the on-off state of the switch. Here, we construct an in silico SSR locus with mutational dynamics calibrated to those of the Haemophilus influenzae mod locus. We simulate its evolution in a regimen of two alternating environments, simultaneously varying the selection coefficient, s, and the epoch length, T. Some recent work in a simpler (two-locus) model suggested that stochastic switching in a regimen of two alternating environments may be evolutionarily favored only if the selection coefficients in the two environments are nearly equal ("symmetric") or selection is very strong. This finding was puzzling, as it greatly restricted the conditions under which stochastic switching might evolve. Instead, we find agreement with other recent theoretical work, observing selective utility for stochastic switching if the product sT is large enough for the favored state to nearly fix in both environments. Symmetry is required neither in s nor in sT. Because we simulate finite populations and use a detailed model of the SSR locus, we are also able to examine the impact of population size and of several SSR locus parameters. Our results indicate that conditions favoring evolution and maintenance of SSR loci in bacteria are quite broad. IMPORTANCE: Bacteria experience frequent changes of environment during the infection cycle. One means to rapidly adapt is stochastic switching: a bacterial lineage will stochastically produce a variety of genotypes, so that some descendants will survive if the environment changes. Stochastic switching mediated by simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci is widespread among bacterial commensals and pathogens and influences critical interactions with host surfaces or immune effectors, thereby affecting host persistence, transmission, and virulence. Here, we use the most detailed in silico model of an SSR locus to date, with its phase variation calibrated to match the mod locus of Haemophilus influenzae. The type III restriction-modification system encoded by mod participates in the regulation of multiple other genes; thus, SSR-mediated phase variation of mod has far-reaching cis-regulatory effects. This coupling of phase-variable switching to complex phenotypic effects has been described as the "phasevarion" and is central to understanding the infection cycle of bacterial commensals and pathogens.

Indexed as

Antigenic VariationMicrosatellite RepeatsAntigens, BacterialComputational BiologyComputer SimulationEvolution, MolecularHaemophilus influenzaeSelection, GeneticAntigens, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID23300246
PMCPMC3546556
OpenAlexW2095743137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.