Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23300245›Full record

ArticlemBio2013

Targeted amino acid substitutions impair streptolysin O toxicity and group A Streptococcus virulence.

Emiliano Chiarot, Cristina Faralla, Nico Chiappini, Giovanna Tuscano, Fabiana Falugi, Gabriella Gambellini, Annarita Taddei, Sabrina Capo, Elena Cartocci, Daniele Veggi and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Epitope Mapping with Sidewinder: An XL-MS and Structural Modeling Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CRISPR-Cas9 Mediated Knockout ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Rational Design of a Glycoconjugate Vaccine against Group AInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emiliano ChiarotNovartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Siena, Italy.
Cristina Faralla
Nico Chiappini
Giovanna Tuscano
Fabiana Falugi
Gabriella Gambellini
Annarita Taddei
Sabrina Capo
Elena Cartocci
Daniele Veggi
Alessia Corrado
Simona Mangiavacchi
Simona Tavarini
Maria Scarselli
Robert Janulczyk
Guido Grandi
Immaculada Margarit
Giuliano Bensi
Newron Pharmaceuticals (Italy) · ITNovartis (Italy) · ITUniversità degli Studi della Tuscia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledStreptolysin O is a potent pore-forming toxin produced by group A Streptococcus. The aims of the present study were to dissect the relative contributions of different structural domains of the protein to hemolytic activity, to obtain a detoxified form of streptolysin O amenable to human vaccine formulation, and to investigate the role of streptolysin O-specific antibodies in protection against group A Streptococcus infection. On the basis of in silico structural predictions, we introduced two amino acid substitutions, one in the proline-rich domain 1 and the other in the conserved undecapeptide loop in domain 4. The resulting streptolysin O derivative showed no toxicity, was highly impaired in binding to eukaryotic cells, and was unable to form organized oligomeric structures on the cell surface. However, it was fully capable of conferring consistent protection in a murine model of group A Streptococcus infection. When we engineered a streptococcal strain to express the double-mutated streptolysin O, a drastic reduction in virulence as well as a diminished capacity to kill immune cells recruited at the infection site was observed. Furthermore, when mice immunized with the toxoid were challenged with the wild-type and mutant strains, protection only against the wild-type strain, not against the strain expressing the double-mutated streptolysin O, was obtained. We conclude that protection occurs by antibody-mediated neutralization of active toxin. IMPORTANCE: We present a novel example of structural design of a vaccine antigen optimized for human vaccine use. Having previously demonstrated that immunization of mice with streptolysin O elicits a protective immune response against infection with group A Streptococcus strains of different serotypes, we developed in this study a double-mutated nontoxic derivative that represents a novel tool for the development of protective vaccine formulations against this important human pathogen. Furthermore, the innovative construction of an isogenic strain expressing a functionally inactive toxin and its use in infection and opsonophagocytosis experiments allowed us to investigate the mechanism by which streptolysin O mediates protection against group A Streptococcus. Finally, the ability of this toxin to directly attack and kill host immune cells during infection was studied in an air pouch model, which allowed parallel quantification of cellular recruitment, vitality, and cytokine release at the infection site.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntitoxinsBacterial ProteinsDisease Models, AnimalMiceModels, MolecularMutant ProteinsStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus pyogenesStreptolysinsSurvival AnalysisVirulenceVirulence FactorsAntibodies, BacterialAntitoxinsBacterial ProteinsMutant Proteinsstreptolysin OStreptolysinsVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID23300245
PMCPMC3546560
OpenAlexW2163046411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.