Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23300016›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2013

Improved survival outcomes with the incidental use of beta-blockers among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy.

H M Wang, Z X Liao, R Komaki, J W Welsh, M S O'Reilly, J Y Chang, Y Zhuang, L B Levy, C Lu, D R Gomez

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 194 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Aspirin and the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases: An Approach Based on Individualized, Integrated Estimation of Risk.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2017
    Guideline
  6. Meta-analysis of the effects of beta blocker on survival time in cancer patients.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2014
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets in lung cancer-nerve crosstalk.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

H M WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Z X Liao
R Komaki
J W Welsh
M S O'Reilly
J Y Chang
Y Zhuang
L B Levy
C Lu
D R Gomez
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreclinical studies have shown that norepinephrine can directly stimulate tumor cell migration and that this effect is mediated by the beta-adrenergic receptor. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 722 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received definitive radiotherapy (RT). A Cox proportional hazard model was utilized to determine the association between beta-blocker intake and locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

resultsIn univariate analysis, patients taking beta-blockers (n = 155) had improved DMFS (P < 0.01), DFS (P < 0.01), and OS (P = 0.01), but not LRPFS (P = 0.33) compared with patients not taking beta-blockers (n = 567). In multivariate analysis, beta-blocker intake was associated with a significantly better DMFS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.67; P = 0.01], DFS (HR, 0.74; P = 0.02), and OS (HR, 0.78; P = 0.02) with adjustment for age, Karnofsky performance score, stage, histology type, concurrent chemotherapy, radiation dose, gross tumor volume, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the use of aspirin. There was no association of beta-blocker use with LRPFS (HR = 0.91, P = 0.63).

conclusionBeta-blocker use is associated with improved DMFS, DFS, and OS in this large cohort of NSCLC patients. Future prospective trials can validate these retrospective findings and determine whether the length and timing of beta-blocker use influence survival outcomes.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCoronary Artery DiseaseDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansHypertensionLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProportional Hazards ModelsReceptors, Adrenergic, betaAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsReceptors, Adrenergic, beta

Identifiers

PMID23300016
PMCPMC3629895
OpenAlexW2132750237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.