Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23299877›Full record

Trial reportAIDS and behavior2013

An evaluation of methods to improve the reporting of adherence in a placebo gel trial in Andhra Pradesh, India.

Sharon A Abbott, Barbara A Friedland, Avina Sarna, Lauren L Katzen, Ulrike Rawiel, Aylur K Srikrishnan, C S Shalini, Waimar Tun, Christine A Kelly, Suniti Solomon and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sharon A AbbottPopulation Council, New York, NY, USA. sharonabbott@gmail.com
Barbara A Friedland
Avina Sarna
Lauren L Katzen
Ulrike Rawiel
Aylur K Srikrishnan
C S Shalini
Waimar Tun
Christine A Kelly
Suniti Solomon
Barbara S Mensch

Funding

Assessing willingness to participate and methods for improving adherence and selfR21HD060270 · NICHD · POPULATION COUNCIL · PI MENSCH, BARBARA SENA · 2008 to 2009
$386k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD060270NICHD NIH HHS R21-HD060270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female sex workers (FSWs) were recruited for a 4-month placebo vaginal gel trial in Nellore, India. Two experiments explored if prior knowledge of biomarkers for unprotected sex and insertion of gel applicators would yield more accurate self-reports. A third experiment compared self-reports of gel use and adherence levels between FSWs randomly assigned to interactive voice response survey (IVRS) and those assigned to paper diaries. Prior knowledge of biomarkers did not improve accuracy of self-reported condom or gel use, nor did it affect actual adherence. Of those who tested positive for the presence of semenogelin in the vagina, 76% reported no unprotected sex in the previous 48 h. Overall, women reported using gel on 90% of days whereas the biomarker indicated gel use on fewer than 50% of days. Compliance to IVRS was low, despite familiarity with mobile phone technology. Additional explorations with other populations are needed.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAdministration, IntravaginalAdolescentAdultAnti-Infective AgentsBiomarkersFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV InfectionsHumansIndiaMiddle AgedSelf ReportSex WorkersUnsafe SexVaginal Creams, Foams, and JelliesAnti-Infective AgentsBiomarkersVaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies

Identifiers

PMID23299877
PMCPMC3674160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.