Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23299824›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2013

Biomarkers and predictors of restorative therapy effects after stroke.

Erin Burke, Steven C Cramer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The modulatory effects of bilateral arm training (BAT) on the brain in stroke patients: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Cross-Frequency Coupling as a Biomarker for Early Stroke Recovery.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erin BurkeDepartment of Anatomy & Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Steven C Cramer

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000153 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M · 2012 to 2015
$12.1M
INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCEUL1RR031985 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M · 2010 to 2011
$7.2M
Motor Function after StrokeR01NS059909 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CRAMER, STEVEN C. · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
BDNF Genotype, Cortical Plasticity and Recovery From StrokeR01NS058755 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI KLEIM, JEFFREY A · 2008 to 2011
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000153NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR031985NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS058755NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS059909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many restorative therapies that promote brain repair are under development. Stroke is very heterogeneous, highlighting the need to identify target populations and to understand intersubject differences in treatment response. Several neuroimaging measures have shown promise as biomarkers and predictors, including measures of structure and function, in gray matter and white matter. The choice of biomarker and predictor can differ with the content of therapy and with the population under study, for example, contralesional hemisphere measures may be of particular importance in patients with more severe injury. Studies of training effects in healthy subjects provide insights useful to brain repair. Limitations of published studies include a focus on chronic stroke, however the brain is most galvanized to respond to restorative therapies in the early days after stroke. Multimodal approaches might be the most robust approach for stratifying patients and so for optimizing prescription of restorative therapies after stroke.

Indexed as

Stroke RehabilitationBiomarkersBrainHumansNeuroimagingRecovery of FunctionStrokeBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID23299824
PMCPMC3580200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.