Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23299226›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2014

Predictors of shared decision making and level of agreement between consumers and providers in psychiatric care.

Sadaaki Fukui, Michelle P Salyers, Marianne S Matthias, Linda Collins, John Thompson, Melinda Coffman, William C Torrey

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03911687 (Communicating Narrative Concerns Entered by RNs), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03911687 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Communicating Narrative Concerns Entered by RNs (CONCERN) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) System

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled60,893ConditionsHospital Acquired ConditionArmsCONCERN CDS system notification
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Recovery at the Clubhouse: challenge, responsibility and growing into a role.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Perceptions and observations of shared decision making during pediatric otolaryngology surgical consultations.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Patient Activation and Mental Health Care Experiences Among Women Veterans.Administration and policy in mental health · 2016
    Article
  20. Sorting it out: Eliciting consumer priorities for recovery in supportive housing.American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sadaaki FukuiCenter for Research Methods and Data Analysis, School of Social Welfare, Office of Mental Health Research and Training, The University of Kansas, 1315 Wakarusa, Dr. Lawrence, KS, 66049, USA, fsadaaki@ku.edu.
Michelle P Salyers
Marianne S Matthias
Linda Collins
John Thompson
Melinda Coffman
William C Torrey

Funding

Recovery Oriented Assertive Community TreatmentR24MH074670 · NIMH · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SALYERS, MICHELLE P. · 2007 to 2011
$2.4M
HSRD VA CDA 10-034NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH074670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantitatively examine elements of shared decision making (SDM), and to establish empirical evidence for factors correlated with SDM and the level of agreement between consumer and provider in psychiatric care. Transcripts containing 128 audio-recorded medication check-up visits with eight providers at three community mental health centers were rated using the Shared Decision Making scale, adapted from Braddock's Informed Decision Making Scale (Braddock et al. 1997, 1999, 2008). Multilevel regression analyses revealed that greater consumer activity in the session and greater decision complexity significantly predicted the SDM score. The best predictor of agreement between consumer and provider was "exploration of consumer preference," with a four-fold increase in full agreement when consumer preferences were discussed more completely. Enhancing active consumer participation, particularly by incorporating consumer preferences in the decision making process appears to be an important factor in SDM.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultCommunity Mental Health CentersFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersPatient PreferencePractice Patterns, Physicians'PsychiatryRetrospective StudiesTape Recording

Identifiers

PMID23299226
PMCPMC3980460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.