Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23297655›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of public health2013

Implementation science and its application to population health.

Rebecca Lobb, Graham A Colditz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03316547 (Supporting and Enhancing NICU Sensory Experiences to Optimize Developmental Outcomes in Preterm Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 173 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03316547 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Supporting and Enhancing NICU Sensory Experiences to Optimize Developmental Outcomes in Preterm Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2017 to 2019Enrolled70ConditionsPremature Birth of NewbornArmsSENSE Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Rural physical activity interventions in the United States: a systematic review and RE-AIM evaluation.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2019
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. A population health approach to insomnia using internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Impact on Physical Fitness of the Chinese CHAMPS: A Clustered Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Promoting Planetary Health, One Bite at a Time: Examining the Efficacy and Feasibility of a Dietary Behaviour Change Intervention.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rebecca LobbDepartment of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. lobbr@wustl.edu
Graham A Colditz

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Worksite Policies and neighborhood Influences on Obesity and Cancer RiskU54CA155496 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2011 to 2016
$9.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCI NIH HHS CA U54-155496NCI NIH HHS U54 CA155496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementation science studies the use of strategies to adapt and use evidence-based interventions in targeted settings (e.g., schools, workplaces, health care facilities, public health departments) to sustain improvements to population health. This nascent field of research is in the early stages of developing theories of implementation and evaluating the properties of measures. Stakeholder engagement, effectiveness studies, research synthesis, and mathematical modeling are some of the methods used by implementation scientists to identify strategies to embed evidence-based interventions in clinical and public health programs. However, for implementation science to reach its full potential to improve population health the existing paradigm for how scientists create evidence, prioritize publications, and synthesize research needs to shift toward greater stakeholder input and improved reporting on external validity. This shift will improve the relevance of the research that is produced and provide information that will help guide decision makers in their selection of research-tested interventions.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineHealth PromotionPublic HealthTranslational Research, BiomedicalCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHumans

Identifiers

PMID23297655
PMCPMC3901430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.