Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23297299›Full record

ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2013

De novo assembly and functional annotation of the olive (Olea europaea) transcriptome.

Antonio Muñoz-Mérida, Juan José González-Plaza, Andrés Cañada, Ana María Blanco, Maria del Carmen García-López, José Manuel Rodríguez, Laia Pedrola, M Dolores Sicardo, M Luisa Hernández, Raúl De la Rosa and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Microsatellite Markers in Olives (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio Muñoz-MéridaDepartment of Integrated Bioinformatics, National Institute for Bioinformatics, University of Málaga, Campus de Teatinos, Málaga, Spain.
Juan José González-Plaza
Andrés Cañada
Ana María Blanco
Maria del Carmen García-López
José Manuel Rodríguez
Laia Pedrola
M Dolores Sicardo
M Luisa Hernández
Raúl De la Rosa
Angjelina Belaj
Mayte Gil-Borja
Francisco Luque
José Manuel Martínez-Rivas
David G Pisano
Oswaldo Trelles
Victoriano Valpuesta
Carmen R Beuzón
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESSpanish National Cancer Research Centre · ESAndalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training · ESSistemas Genómicos · ESUniversidad de Jaén · ESUniversidad de Málaga · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olive breeding programmes are focused on selecting for traits as short juvenile period, plant architecture suited for mechanical harvest, or oil characteristics, including fatty acid composition, phenolic, and volatile compounds to suit new markets. Understanding the molecular basis of these characteristics and improving the efficiency of such breeding programmes require the development of genomic information and tools. However, despite its economic relevance, genomic information on olive or closely related species is still scarce. We have applied Sanger and 454 pyrosequencing technologies to generate close to 2 million reads from 12 cDNA libraries obtained from the Picual, Arbequina, and Lechin de Sevilla cultivars and seedlings from a segregating progeny of a Picual × Arbequina cross. The libraries include fruit mesocarp and seeds at three relevant developmental stages, young stems and leaves, active juvenile and adult buds as well as dormant buds, and juvenile and adult roots. The reads were assembled by library or tissue and then assembled together into 81 020 unigenes with an average size of 496 bases. Here, we report their assembly and their functional annotation.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantMolecular Sequence AnnotationTranscriptomeBreedingDatabases, GeneticExpressed Sequence TagsFruitGene LibraryOleaOlive OilPlant OilsSeedsSequence Analysis, DNAOlive OilPlant Oils

Identifiers

PMID23297299
PMCPMC3576661
OpenAlexW2003751780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.