Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23296997›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2013

Coarse grained normal mode analysis vs. refined Gaussian Network Model for protein residue-level structural fluctuations.

Jun-Koo Park, Robert Jernigan, Zhijun Wu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Machine learning predictions from unpredictable chaos.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  4. Persistent Sheaf Laplacian Analysis of Protein Flexibility.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Knot data analysis using multiscale Gauss link integral.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Persistent spectral graph.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2020
    Article
  11. A review of mathematical representations of biomolecular data.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2020
    Review
  12. MathDL: mathematical deep learning for D3R Grand Challenge 4.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Blind prediction of protein B-factor and flexibility.The Journal of chemical physics · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jun-Koo ParkDepartment of Mathematics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA. jun-koo.park@houghton.edu
Robert Jernigan
Zhijun Wu

Funding

Coarse-Grained Models of ProteinsR01GM072014 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JERNIGAN, ROBERT L · 2004 to 2012
$2.3M
High-Accuracy Protein Models Derived from Lower Resolution DataR01GM081680 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KLOCZKOWSKI, ANDRZEJ · 2007 to 2009
$763k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072014NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081680NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM081680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate several approaches to coarse grained normal mode analysis on protein residual-level structural fluctuations by choosing different ways of representing the residues and the forces among them. Single-atom representations using the backbone atoms C(α), C, N, and C(β) are considered. Combinations of some of these atoms are also tested. The force constants between the representative atoms are extracted from the Hessian matrix of the energy function and served as the force constants between the corresponding residues. The residue mean-square-fluctuations and their correlations with the experimental B-factors are calculated for a large set of proteins. The results are compared with all-atom normal mode analysis and the residue-level Gaussian Network Model. The coarse-grained methods perform more efficiently than all-atom normal mode analysis, while their B-factor correlations are also higher. Their B-factor correlations are comparable with those estimated by the Gaussian Network Model and in many cases better. The extracted force constants are surveyed for different pairs of residues with different numbers of separation residues in sequence. The statistical averages are used to build a refined Gaussian Network Model, which is able to predict residue-level structural fluctuations significantly better than the conventional Gaussian Network Model in many test cases.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalAmino AcidsData Interpretation, StatisticalProtein ConformationProteinsStructure-Activity RelationshipAmino AcidsProteins

Identifiers

PMID23296997
PMCPMC4373625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.