ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2013
Tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma: is there a rational reason for targeted therapy using angiogenic inhibition? Analysis of seven cases.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tubulocystic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Rare Renal Tumor.Journal of kidney cancer and VHL · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generally, patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are viewed as potential candidates for antiangiogenic targeted therapy. Tubulocystic RCC (TCRC) is a recently described entity which may behave aggressively, and the rationale for antiangiogenic therapy in this group of renal tumors has yet to be determined. Seven TCRCs and five non-tumor tissue samples from seven patients were subjected to relative expression analysis of mRNA levels of 16 genes involved in three angiogenic signal pathways: (1) VHL/HIF, (2) RTK/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and (3) PI3K/Akt/mTOR. Two of them, pathways (2) and (3), are often targeted by antiangiogenic agents. We also determined the mutation and methylation status of the VHL gene. Finally, the levels of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), HIF-1α, HIF-2α proteins, and phosphorylated mTOR protein were also determined. The comparison of tumor and control samples revealed no changes of mRNA levels of the following genes: VHL, HIF-1α, HIF-2α, PTEN, Akt2, Akt3, mTOR, VEGFA, KDR, HRas, C-Jun, EGFR, and FGF2. Significantly elevated mRNA level of TP53 was found, while the mRNA levels of FLT1 and C-FOS were reduced in tumor samples. No mutations or methylation in the VHL gene were found. Changes in levels of studied proteins VEGFA, HIF-1α, HIF-2α, and increased phosphorylation of mTOR protein were not found. Three studied angiogenic pathways (VHL/HIF, RTK/MAPK, and PI3K/Akt/mTOR) seem not to be upregulated in TCRC samples, so there appears to be no rationale for a general recommendation of antiangiogenic targeted therapeutic protocols for patients with these tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.