Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23296629›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2013

Pancreatic stone protein as a novel marker for neonatal sepsis.

Luregn J Schlapbach, Rolf Graf, Andreas Woerner, Matteo Fontana, Urs Zimmermann-Baer, David Glauser, Eric Giannoni, Thierry Roger, Christoph Müller, Mathias Nelle and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Soluble TREM-1 as a predictive factor of neonatal sepsis: a meta-analysis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Luregn J SchlapbachNeonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University of Berne, Bern, Switzerland. luregn.schlapbach@mater.org.au
Rolf Graf
Andreas Woerner
Matteo Fontana
Urs Zimmermann-Baer
David Glauser
Eric Giannoni
Thierry Roger
Christoph Müller
Mathias Nelle
Martin Stocker
University of Bern · CHBoston Children's Hospital · USKantonsspital Winterthur · CHUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly-onset sepsis (EOS) is one of the main causes for the admission of newborns to the neonatal intensive care unit. However, traditional infection markers are poor diagnostic markers of EOS. Pancreatic stone protein (PSP) is a promising sepsis marker in adults. The aim of this study was to investigate whether determining PSP improves the diagnosis of EOS in comparison with other infection markers.

methodsThis was a prospective multicentre study involving 137 infants with a gestational age of >34 weeks who were admitted with suspected EOS. PSP, procalcitonin (PCT), soluble human triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1), macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured at admission. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed.

resultsThe level of PSP in infected infants was significantly higher than that in uninfected ones (median 11.3 vs. 7.5 ng/ml, respectively; p = 0.001). The ROC area under the curve was 0.69 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.59-0.80; p < 0.001] for PSP, 0.77 (95 % CI 0.66-0.87; p < 0.001) for PCT, 0.66 (95 % CI 0.55-0.77; p = 0.006) for CRP, 0.62 (0.51-0.73; p = 0.055) for sTREM-1 and 0.54 (0.41-0.67; p = 0.54) for MIF. PSP independently of PCT predicted EOS (p < 0.001), and the use of both markers concomitantly significantly increased the ability to diagnose EOS. A bioscore combining PSP (>9 ng/ml) and PCT (>2 ng/ml) was the best predictor of EOS (0.83; 95 % CI 0.74-0.93; p < 0.001) and resulted in a negative predictive value of 100 % and a positive predictive value of 71 %.

conclusionsIn this prospective study, the diagnostic performance of PSP and PCT was superior to that of traditional markers and a combination bioscore improved the diagnosis of sepsis. Our findings suggest that PSP is a valuable biomarker in combination with PCT in EOS.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLithostathineMacrophage Migration-Inhibitory FactorsMaleMembrane GlycoproteinsProspective StudiesProtein PrecursorsReceptors, ImmunologicROC CurveBiomarkersCALCA protein, humanCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideC-Reactive ProteinLithostathineMacrophage Migration-Inhibitory FactorsMembrane GlycoproteinsProtein PrecursorsReceptors, ImmunologicTREM1 protein, humanTriggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells-1

Identifiers

PMID23296629
OpenAlexW2093682638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.