ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2013
Computational study and peptide inhibitors design for the CDK9 - cyclin T1 complex.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structure-guided design and cloning of peptide inhibitors targeting CDK9/cyclin T1 protein-protein interaction.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Targeting Protein-Protein Interactions to Inhibit Cyclin-Dependent Kinases.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Discovery of a tetrahydroisoquinoline-based CDK9-cyclin T1 protein-protein interaction inhibitor as an anti-proliferative and anti-migration agent against triple-negative breast cancer cells.Genes & diseases · 2022Article
- Inhibition of the CDK9-cyclin T1 protein-protein interaction as a new approach against triple-negative breast cancer.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2022Article
- Evaluation of peptide designing strategy against subunit reassociation in mucin 1: A steered molecular dynamics approach.PloS one · 2017Article
- Overview of CDK9 as a target in cancer research.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2016Review
- Molecular analysis of the interaction between staphylococcal virulence factor Sbi-IV and complement C3d.Biophysical journal · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cyclin dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) is a protein that belongs to the cyclin-dependent kinases family, and its main role is in the regulation of the cell transcription processes. Since the increased activity of CDK9 is connected with the development of pathological processes such as tumor growth and survival and HIV-1 replication, inhibition of the CDK9 could be of particular interest for treating such diseases. The activation of CDK9 is initiated by the formation of CDK9/cyclin T1 complex, therefore disruption of its formation could be a promising strategy for the design of CDK9 inhibitors. In order to assist in the design of potential inhibitors of CDK9/cyclin T1 complex formation, a computational study of the CDK9/cyclin T1 interface was conducted. Ten peptides were designed using the information from the analysis of the complex, hot spot residues and fragment based design. The designed peptides were docked to CDK9 structures obtained by molecular dynamics simulations of CDK9/cyclin T1 complex and the CDK9 alone and their binding affinities were evaluated using molecular mechanics Poisson Boltzman surface area (MM-PBSA) method and steered molecular dynamics (SMD). Designed peptide sequences LQTLGF and ESIILQ, both derived from the surface of cyclin T1, as well as the peptide sequence PRWPE, derived from fragment based design, showed the most favorable binding properties and were selected for our further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.