Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23296250›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2013

Oesophageal cancer--an overview.

Michael Schweigert, Attila Dubecz, Hubert J Stein

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 2.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2019
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Proton therapy posterior beam approach with pencil beam scanning for esophageal cancer : Clinical outcome, dosimetry, and feasibility.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2016
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Thermally Gated Dual-Cascade Nanozyme for Enhanced Mild-Temperature Photothermal Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Liquid Biopsies and Molecular Imaging for Precise Cancer Management.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2022 edited by the Japan Esophageal Society: part 2.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Long Noncoding RNAJournal of Cancer · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael SchweigertDepartment of General and Thoracic Surgery, Klinikum Nuremberg Nord, Prof-Ernst-Nathan-Strasse 1, D-90419 Nuremberg, Germany. michael.schweigert@klinikum-nuernberg.de
Attila Dubecz
Hubert J Stein
Nuremberg Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oesophageal carcinoma is one of the most virulent malignant diseases and a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Diagnosis and accuracy of pretreatment staging have substantially improved throughout the past three decades. Therapy is challenging and the optimal approach is still debated. Oesophagectomy is considered to be the procedure of choice in patients with operable oesophageal cancer. Endoscopic measures and limited surgical procedures provide an alternative in patients with early carcinomas confined to the oesophageal mucosa. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy are also frequently applied, either as definitive treatment or as neoadjuvant therapy within multimodal approaches. The question of whether multimodal treatment offers improved results has been the focus of many studies since the 1990s. Although results are discordant and even some meta-analyses remain inconclusive, it is now widely accepted that multimodal therapy leads to a modest survival benefit. The role of minimally invasive oesophagectomy is not yet defined. Endoscopic stent insertion, radiotherapy and other palliative measures provide relief of tumour-related symptoms in advanced, unresectable tumour stages.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyEsophagoscopyHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyPalliative CareRadiotherapy, AdjuvantStents

Identifiers

PMID23296250
OpenAlexW2314358096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.