Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23295415›Full record

ReviewImmunology and cell biology2013

Immunological characteristics of human mesenchymal stem cells and multipotent adult progenitor cells.

Sandra A Jacobs, Valerie D Roobrouck, Catherine M Verfaillie, Stefaan W Van Gool

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunology and cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03626090 (Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Liver Cirrhosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 115 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03626090 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Liver Cirrhosis: A Phase I/II Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorStem Med Pte. Ltd.Ran2018 to 2021Enrolled20ConditionsLiver CirrhosisArmsAutologous BM MSC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The role of MSCs and CAR-MSCs in cellular immunotherapy.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sandra A JacobsDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Laboratory of Pediatric Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. sandra2.jacobs@uzleuven.be
Valerie D Roobrouck
Catherine M Verfaillie
Stefaan W Van Gool

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic, also termed adult, stem cells are highly attractive biomedical cell candidates because of their extensive replication potential and functional multilineage differentiation capacity. They can be used for drug and toxicity screenings in preclinical studies, as in vitro model to study differentiation or for regenerative medicine to aid in the repair of tissues or replace tissues that are lost upon disease, injury or ageing. Multipotent adult progenitor cells (MAPCs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are two types of adult stem cells derived from bone marrow that are currently being used clinically for tissue regeneration and for their immunomodulatory and trophic effects. This review will give an overview of the phenotypic and functional differences between human MAPCs and MSCs, with a strong emphasis on their immunological characteristics. Finally, we will discuss the clinical studies in which MSCs and MAPCs are already used.

Indexed as

Adult Stem CellsAgingBone Marrow CellsCell DifferentiationHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsRegenerative Medicine

Identifiers

PMID23295415
PMCPMC3540326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.