ArticleContemporary clinical trials2013
Achieving high cancer control trial enrollment in the community setting: an analysis of the Community Clinical Oncology Program.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03243396 (Building and Sustaining Interventions for Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Building and Sustaining Interventions for Children (BASIC): Task-sharing Mental Health Care in Low-resource Settings
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Strategies addressing barriers to clinical trial enrollment of underrepresented populations: a systematic review.Contemporary clinical trials · 2014Pooled it
- Barriers for cancer clinical trial enrollment: A qualitative study of the perspectives of healthcare providers.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2022Article
- One size does not fit all: Insights for engaging front-line clinicians in pragmatic clinical trials.Learning health systems · 2021Article
- Enrollment of adolescents and young adults onto SWOG cancer research network clinical trials: A comparative analysis by treatment site and era.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
- Low Enrollment of Adolescents and Young Adults Onto Cancer Trials: Insights From the Community Clinical Oncology Program.Journal of oncology practice · 2016Article
- Organizational and physician factors associated with patient enrollment in cancer clinical trials.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2014Article
- Impact of a clinical trial initiative on clinical trial enrollment in a multidisciplinary prostate cancer clinic.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2014Article
- Patients' rationale for declining participation in a cancer-associated weight loss study.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2014Article
- Barriers and challenges to global clinical cancer research.The oncologist · 2014Article
- The National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Trial Accrual Symposium: summary and recommendations.Journal of oncology practice · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Determining the factors that lead to successful enrollment of patients in cancer control clinical trials is essential as cancer patients are often burdened with side effects such as pain, nausea, and fatigue. One promising intervention for increasing enrollment in cancer control trials is the National Cancer Institute's Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP). In this article, we examined CCOP staffing, policies, and procedures associated with enrollment in control trials. Data were obtained from three sources: the online CCOP, MB-CCOP, and Research Base Management System, CCOP Annual Progress Reports, and a survey of CCOP Administrators conducted in 2011. We analyzed cancer control trial accrual in 2011 among 46 CCOPs using multivariate regression. Three factors were significant predictors of accrual. First, having a team of staff dedicated to enrolling patients in control and prevention trials, compared to having no dedicated staff, was associated on average with an additional 30 patients enrolled in control trials (p<0.05). Second, CCOPs that recognized physicians for enrolling a large number of patients compared to CCOPs that did not recognize high enrolling physicians enrolled on average an additional 25 patients in control trials (p<0.05). Lastly, the number of cancer control trials available was also associated with enrollment (β=5.50, p<0.00). Our results indicate that CCOPs looking to increase enrollment in control trials should consider dedicating a team of staff to enroll patients in these types of trials. In addition, CCOPs or other volunteer research systems looking to increase physician participation should consider recognizing high enrolling physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.