Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23295103›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Practical health co-operation - the impact of a referral template on quality of care and health care co-operation: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Henrik Wåhlberg, Per Christian Valle, Siri Malm, Ann Ragnhild Broderstad

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01470963 (Practical Health Co-operation - a Randomised Controlled Intervention Study. The Impact of a Referral Template on Quality of Care and Health Care Co-operation Between Primary and Secondary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01470963 nacompletednot on this map

Practical Health Co-operation - a Randomised Controlled Intervention Study. The Impact of a Referral Template on Quality of Care and Health Care Co-operation Between Primary and Secondary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital of North NorwayRan2011 to 2014Enrolled500ConditionsReferral, Quality of Health CareArmsImplementation of referral template
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Decision Support Systems for Healthcare Referral Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henrik WåhlbergDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Norway. henrik.wahlberg2@unn.no
Per Christian Valle
Siri Malm
Ann Ragnhild Broderstad

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe referral letter plays a key role both in the communication between primary and secondary care, and in the quality of the health care process. Many studies have attempted to evaluate and improve the quality of these referral letters, but few have assessed the impact of their quality on the health care delivered to each patient.

methodsA cluster randomized trial, with the general practitioner office as the unit of randomization, has been designed to evaluate the effect of a referral intervention on the quality of health care delivered. Referral templates have been developed covering four diagnostic groups: dyspepsia, suspected colonic malignancy, chest pain, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Of the 14 general practitioner offices primarily served by University Hospital of North Norway Harstad, seven were randomized to the intervention group. The primary outcome is a collated quality indicator score developed for each diagnostic group. Secondary outcomes include: quality of the referral, health process outcome such as waiting times, and adequacy of prioritization. In addition, information on patient satisfaction will be collected using self-report questionnaires. Outcome data will be collected on the individual level and analyzed by random effects linear regression. DISCUSSION: Poor communication between primary and secondary care can lead to inappropriate investigations and erroneous prioritization. This study's primary hypothesis is that the use of a referral template in this communication will lead to a measurable increase in the quality of health care delivered.

trial registrationThis trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The trial registration number is NCT01470963.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorGeneral PracticeInterdisciplinary CommunicationPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareReferral and ConsultationResearch DesignSecondary Health CareChest PainClinical ProtocolsCluster AnalysisColonic NeoplasmsDyspepsiaHealth PrioritiesHospitals, UniversityHumans

Identifiers

PMID23295103
PMCPMC3551794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.