Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23294627›Full record

ArticleCell transplantation2014

Survival of neural progenitors allografted into the CNS of immunocompetent recipients is highly dependent on transplantation site.

M Janowski, C Engels, M Gorelik, A Lyczek, S Bernard, J W M Bulte, P Walczak

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell transplantation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Real-time MRI for precise and predictable intra-arterial stem cell delivery to the central nervous system.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Nanoparticles and clinically applicable cell tracking.The British journal of radiology · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M JanowskiRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
C Engels
M Gorelik
A Lyczek
S Bernard
J W M Bulte
P Walczak
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

MR Tracking of Magnetically Labeled Stem Cells in CNSR01NS045062 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BULTE, JEFF W. · 2003 to 2013
$4.4M
Efficient Targeting of Therapeutic Cells in Stroke and EAER01NS076573 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WALCZAK, PIOTR · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NINDS NIH HHS 1R01 NS076573NINDS NIH HHS 2R01 NS045062NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045062NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allografts continue to be used in clinical neurotransplantation studies; hence, it is crucial to understand the mechanisms that govern allograft tolerance. We investigated the impact of transplantation site within the brain on graft survival. Mouse [Friend leukemia virus, strain B (FVB)] glial precursors, transfected with luciferase, were injected (3 × 10(5)) into the forceps minor (FM) or striatum (STR). Immunodeficient rag2(-/-) and immunocompetent BALB/c mice were used as recipients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed that cells were precisely deposited at the selected coordinates. The graft viability was assessed noninvasively with bioluminescent imaging (BLI) for a period of 16 days. Regardless of implantation site, all grafts (n = 10) deposited in immunodeficient animals revealed excellent survival. In contrast, immunocompetent animals only accepted grafts at the STR site (n = 10), whereas all the FM grafts were rejected (n = 10). To investigate the factors that led to rejection of FM grafts, with acceptance of STR grafts, another group of animals (n = 19) was sacrificed during the prerejection period, on day 5. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging with IRDye 800CW-polyethylene glycol probe displayed similar blood-brain barrier disruption at both graft locations. The morphological distribution of FM grafts was cylindrical, parallel to the needle track, whereas cells transplanted into the STR accumulated along the border between the STR and the corpus callosum. There was significantly less infiltration by both innate and adaptive immune cells in the STR grafts, especially along the calloso-striatal border. With allograft survival being dependent on the transplantation site, the anatomical coordinates of the graft target should always be taken into account as it may determine the success or failure of therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCells, CulturedCell SurvivalCentral Nervous SystemGraft SurvivalImmunohistochemistryMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiceTransplantation, Homologous

Identifiers

PMID23294627
PMCPMC4385386
OpenAlexW2325984360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.