Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23294313›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of pharmacology and toxicology2013

Design of peptide and peptidomimetic ligands with novel pharmacological activity profiles.

Victor J Hruby, Minying Cai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Expanding the Scope of Protein Synthesis Using Modified Ribosomes.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. In silico study of peptide inhibitors against BACE 1.Systems and synthetic biology · 2015
    Article
  15. Characterization of cyclic peptides containing disulfide bonds.Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis · 2015
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victor J HrubyDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA. hruby@email.arizona.edu
Minying Cai
University of Arizona · US

Funding

NOVEL NON-PEPTIDE OPIOID LIGANDS FOR PAINR01DA013449 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI HRUBY, VICTOR J · 2000 to 2015
$6.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptide hormones and neurotransmitters are of central importance in most aspects of intercellular communication and are involved in virtually all degenerative diseases. In this review, we discuss physicochemical approaches to the design of novel peptide and peptidomimetic agonists, antagonists, inverse agonists, and related compounds that have unique biological activity profiles, reduced toxic side effects, and, if desired, the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Designing ligands for specific biological and medical needs is emphasized, as is the close collaboration of chemists and biologists to maximize the chances for success. Special emphasis is placed on the use of conformational (ϕ-ψ space) and topographical (χ space) considerations in design.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierDrug DesignHumansLigandsPeptidesPeptidomimeticsLigandsPeptidesPeptidomimetics

Identifiers

PMID23294313
PMCPMC5079645
OpenAlexW2152457327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.