Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23293929›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug discovery2013

Latest in vitro and in vivo models of celiac disease.

Samantha Stoven, Joseph A Murray, Eric V Marietta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug discovery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Gastrointestinal tract, its pathophysiology andWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Celiac disease-on-chip: Modeling a multifactorial disease in vitro.United European gastroenterology journal · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Microfluidic Organ-on-a-Chip Models of Human Intestine.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samantha StovenMayo Clinic, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Joseph A Murray
Eric V Marietta

Funding

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CELIAC DISEASE--A POPULATION BASED STUDYR01DK057892 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MURRAY, JOSEPH A · 2000 to 2010
$3.9M
A HLA Mouse Model for Gluten Sensitivity and EnteropathyR01DK071003 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MURRAY, JOSEPH A · 2006 to 2009
$1.1M
A HLA Mouse Model for Gluten Sensitivity and EnteropathyR56DK071003 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MURRAY, JOSEPH A · 2010 to 2010
$394k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK071003NIDDK NIH HHS DK57892NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK057892NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK071003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrently, the only treatment for celiac disease is a gluten-free diet, and there is an increased desire for alternative therapies. In vitro and in vivo models of celiac disease have been generated in order to better understand the pathogenesis of celiac disease, and this review will discuss these models as well as the testing of alternative therapies using these models. AREAS COVERED: The research discussed describes the different in vitro and in vivo models of celiac disease that currently exist and how they have contributed to our understanding of how gluten can stimulate both innate and adaptive immune responses in celiac patients. We also provide a summary on the alternative therapies that have been tested with these models and discuss whether subsequent clinical trials were done based on these tests done with these models of celiac disease. EXPERT OPINION: Only a few of the alternative therapies that have been tested with animal models have gone on to clinical trials; however, those that did go on to clinical trial have provided promising results from a safety standpoint. Further trials are required to determine if some of these therapies may serve as an effective adjunct to a gluten-free diet to alleviate the adverse affects associated with accidental gluten exposure. A "magic-bullet" approach may not be the answer to celiac disease, but possibly a future cocktail of these different therapeutics may allow celiac patients to consume an unrestricted diet.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAdaptive ImmunityAnimalsCeliac DiseaseClinical Trials as TopicDiet, Gluten-FreeGlutensHumansImmunity, InnateModels, TheoreticalGlutens

Identifiers

PMID23293929
PMCPMC3605231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.