Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23293836›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on therapeutic targets2013

Cathepsin B as a cancer target.

Christopher S Gondi, Jasti S Rao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on therapeutic targets, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 184 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
184citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

184 citing papers in PubMed, 376 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

124 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher S GondiUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Department of Cancer Biology and Pharmacology and Neurosurgery, Peoria, IL, USA.
Jasti S Rao
Peoria campus of the University of Illinois System · US

Funding

Cath B and uPAR si RNA constructs regressed glioma growthR01CA116708 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI O'BRYAN, JOHN P · 2005 to 2014
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA 116708NCI NIH HHS R01 CA116708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCathepsin B is of significant importance to cancer therapy as it is involved in various pathologies and oncogenic processes in humans. Numerous studies have shown that abnormal regulation of cathepsin B overexpression is correlated with invasive and metastatic phenotypes in cancers. Cathepsin B is normally associated with the lysosomes involved in autophagy and immune response, but its aberrant expression has been shown to lead to cancers. AREAS COVERED: This review highlights the oncogenic role of cathepsin B, discusses the regulation of cathepsin B in light of oncogenesis, discusses the role of cathepsin B as a signaling molecule, and highlights the therapeutic potential of targeting cathepsin B. EXPERT OPINION: Targeting cathepsin B alone does not appear to abolish tumor growth, and this is probably because cathepsin B appears to have diverse functions and influence numerous pathways. It is not clear whether global suppression of cathepsin B activity or expression would produce unintended effects or cause the activation or suppression of unwanted pathways. A localized approach for targeting the expression of cathepsin B would be more relevant. Moreover, a combination of targeting cathepsin B with other relevant oncogenic molecules has significant therapeutic potential.

Indexed as

AnimalsCathepsin BHumansNeoplasmsCathepsin B

Identifiers

PMID23293836
PMCPMC3587140
OpenAlexW2128779315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.