ArticleFrontiers in oncology2012
Trends in Adherence to Recommended Cancer Screening: The US Population and Working Cancer Survivors.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient Adherence to Screening for Lung Cancer in the US: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2020Pooled it
- The impact of health information technology on cancer care across the continuum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Pooled it
- Improving Screening Uptake among Breast Cancer Survivors and Their First-Degree Relatives at Elevated Risk to Breast Cancer: Results and Implications of a Randomized Study in the State of Georgia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Trial
- Factors associated with participation in colorectal and breast cancer screening among cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Review
- Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines Among Age-Eligible US Women: Findings From NHIS 2021.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Survivorship care plans and adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening guidelines among cancer survivors in a national sample.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Temporal Trend in Uptake of the National General Health Checkups and Cancer Screening Program among Korean Women with Breast Cancer.Cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- The aggregate value of cancer screenings in the United States: full potential value and value considering adherence.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Factors associated with breast cancer screening services use among women in the United States: An application of the Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use.Preventive medicine · 2023Article
- Trends in Participation Rates of the National Cancer Screening Program among Cancer Survivors in Korea.Cancers · 2020Article
- Benefits and harms of lung cancer screening in HIV-infected individuals with CD4+ cell count at least 500 cells/μl.AIDS (London, England) · 2018Article
- Technical Assistance and Changes in Nutrition and Physical Activity Practices in the National Early Care and Education Learning Collaboratives Project, 2015-2016.Preventing chronic disease · 2018Article
- Population impact of lung cancer screening in the United States: Projections from a microsimulation model.PLoS medicine · 2018Article
- Cancer incidence among capacitor manufacturing workers exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls.American journal of industrial medicine · 2017Article
- The burden of selected cancers in the US: health behaviors and health care resource utilization.Cancer management and research · 2017Article
- Article
- Rural-Urban Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers in Nebraska.Journal of community health · 2015Article
- Breast cancer screening practices among first-generation immigrant muslim women.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOver the past decade the United States (US) has seen a decrease in advanced cancer diagnoses. There has also been an increase in the number of cancer survivors returning to work. Cancer screening behaviors among survivors may play an important role in their return-to-work process. Adherence to a post-treatment cancer screening protocol increases early detection of secondary tumors and reduces potentially limiting side-effects. We compared screening trends among all cancer survivors, working survivors, and the general population over the last decade. MATERIALS AND
methodsTrends in adherence to recommended screening were analyzed by site-specific cancer. We used the Healthy People goals as a measure of desired adherence. We selected participants 18+ years from 1997 to 2010 National Health Interview Survey for years where detailed cancer screening information was available. Using the recommendations of the American Cancer Society as a guide, we assessed adherence to cancer screening across the decade. There were 174,393 participants. Analyses included 7,528 working cancer survivors representing 3.8 million US workers, and 119,374 adults representing more than 100 million working Americans with no cancer history.
resultsThe US population met the Healthy People 2010 goal for colorectal screening, but declined in all other recommended cancer screening. Cancer survivors met and maintained the HP2010 goal for all, except cervical cancer screening. Survivors had higher screening rates than the general population. Among survivors, white-collar and service occupations had higher screening rates than blue-collar survivors.
conclusionCancer survivors report higher screening rates than the general population. Nevertheless, national screening rates are lower than desired, and disparities exist by cancer history and occupation. Understanding existing disparities, and the impact of cancer screening on survivors is crucial as the number of working survivors increases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.