Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23293712›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of hepatology2012

Bone marrow progenitor cells do not contribute to liver fibrogenic cells.

Bruno Diaz Paredes, Lanuza Alaby Pinheiro Faccioli, Luiz Fernando Quintanilha, Karina Dutra Asensi, Camila Zaverucha do Valle, Paulo César Canary, Christina Maeda Takiya, Antonio Carlos Campos de Carvalho, Regina Coeli Dos Santos Goldenberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of hepatology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Bruno Diaz ParedesBruno Diaz Paredes, Lanuza Alaby Pinheiro Faccioli, Luiz Fernando Quintanilha, Karina Dutra Asensi, Camila Zaverucha do Valle, Christina Maeda Takiya, Antonio Carlos Campos de Carvalho, Regina Coeli dos Santos Goldenberg, Carlos Chagas Filho Biophysics Institute, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil.
Lanuza Alaby Pinheiro Faccioli
Luiz Fernando Quintanilha
Karina Dutra Asensi
Camila Zaverucha do Valle
Paulo César Canary
Christina Maeda Takiya
Antonio Carlos Campos de Carvalho
Regina Coeli Dos Santos Goldenberg
Nationwide Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the contribution of bone marrow (BM) cells to hepatic fibrosis.

methodsTo establish a model of chimerism, C57Bl/6 female mice were subjected to full-body irradiation (7 Gy) resulting in BM myeloablation. BM mononuclear cells obtained from male transgenic mice expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) were used for reconstitution. Engraftment was confirmed by flow cytometry. To induce liver injury, chimeric animals received carbon tetrachloride (CCl(4)) 0.5 mL/kg intraperitoneally twice a week for 30 d (CCl(4) 30 d) and age-matched controls received saline (Saline 30 d). At the end of this period, animals were sacrificed for post mortem analysis. Liver samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to observe liver architectural changes and with Sirius red for collagen quantification by morphometric analysis. α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) was analyzed by confocal microscopy to identify GFP+ cells with myofibroblast (MF) characteristics. Liver tissue, BM and peripheral blood were collected and prepared for flow cytometric analysis using specific markers for detection of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and precursors from the BM.

resultsInjury to the liver induced changes in the hepatic parenchymal architecture, as reflected by the presence of inflammatory infiltrate and an increase in collagen deposition (Saline 30 d = 11.10% ± 1.12% vs CCl(4) 30 d = 12.60% ± 0.73%, P = 0.0329). Confocal microscopy revealed increased reactivity against α-SMA in CCl(4) 30 d compared to Saline 30 d, but there was no co-localization with GFP+ cells, suggesting that cells from BM do not differentiate to MFs. Liver flow cytometric analysis showed a significant increase of CD45+/GFP+ cells in liver tissue (Saline 30 d = 3.2% ± 2.2% vs CCl(4) 30 d = 5.8% ± 1.3%, P = 0.0458), suggesting that this increase was due to inflammatory cell infiltration (neutrophils and monocytes). There was also a significant increase of common myeloid progenitor cells (CD117+/CD45+) in the livers of CCl(4)-treated animals (Saline 30 d = 2.16% ± 1.80% vs CCl(4) 30 d = 5.60% ± 1.30%, P = 0.0142). In addition the GFP-/CD38+/CD45- subpopulation was significantly increased in the CCl(4) 30 d group compared to the Saline 30 d group (17.5% ± 3.9% vs 9.3% ± 2.4%, P = 0.004), indicating that the increase in the activated HSC subpopulation was not of BM origin.

conclusionBM progenitor cells do not contribute to fibrosis, but there is a high recruitment of inflammatory cells that stimulates HSCs and MFs of liver origin.

Indexed as

Bone marrowChimeric miceFibrosisGreen fluorescent protein+ cellsLiverProgenitor cells

Identifiers

PMID23293712
PMCPMC3537161
OpenAlexW2016294433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.