Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23292954›Full record

ReviewJournal of applied genetics2013

Current controversies in Niemann-Pick C1 disease: steroids or gangliosides; neurons or neurons and glia.

Robert P Erickson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of applied genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A 13-year old female with intractable seizures.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Robert P EricksonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724-5073, USA. erickson@peds.arizona.edu

Funding

Non-Invasive Monitoring of NPC Disease Progression and TherapyR01EB000343 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI TROUARD, THEODORE P · 2002 to 2010
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS 5R01 EB000343-95
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a recent explosion in research on Niemann-Pick type C disease. Much of the work has used mouse models or cells in culture to elucidate the pathophysiological mechanisms resulting in the phenotype of the disease. This work has generated several contrasting views on the mechanism, which are labeled 'controversies' here. In this review, two of these controversies are explored. The first concerns which stored materials are causative in the disease: cholesterol, gangliosides and sphingolipids, or something else? The second concerns which cells in the body require Npc1 in order to function properly: somatic cells, neurons only, or neurons and glia? For the first controversy, a clear answer has emerged. More research will be needed in order to definitively solve the second controversy.

Indexed as

AnimalsCholesterolGangliosidesHumansMembrane GlycoproteinsMiceNeurogliaNeuronsNiemann-Pick Disease, Type CSphingolipidsSteroidsCholesterolGangliosidesMembrane GlycoproteinsSphingolipidsSteroids

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.