Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23292930›Full record

ArticleJournal of cell communication and signaling2013

CCN6: a novel method of aTAKing cancer.

Andrew Leask

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cell communication and signaling, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew LeaskDepartments of Dentistry and Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, Dental Sciences Building, London, ON, Canada, N6A 5C1, Andrew.leask@schulich.uwo.ca.
Western University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well-established that the expression of CCN family of matricellular proteins is altered in essentially all cancers and, hence, targeting these proteins may be a novel therapeutic approach to treating these diseases. For example, CCN6 (WISP3) is downregulated in aggressive breast cancers, and this phenomenon appears to result in the tumor survival by promoting Akt phosphorylation. In a recent report by Pal et al. (Cancer Res 72(18):4818-4828, 2012), CCN6 knockdown was shown to promote BMP4-mediated activation of the Smad-independent TAK1 and p38 kinases. CCN6 expression was inversely associated with BMP4 and phospho-p38 levels in 69 % of invasive breast carcinomas. TAK1 inhibition has been previously shown to decrease tumor progression in preclinical models of TAK1-dependent cancers. These data are consistent with the idea that CCN6 may represent a novel therapeutic approach, as compared to attacking TAK1 directly, to selectively target breast cancers.

Identifiers

PMID23292930
PMCPMC3660687
OpenAlexW2088309020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.