Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23292636›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2013

TargetHunter: an in silico target identification tool for predicting therapeutic potential of small organic molecules based on chemogenomic database.

Lirong Wang, Chao Ma, Peter Wipf, Haibin Liu, Weiwei Su, Xiang-Qun Xie

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Virtual screening: hope, hype, and the fine line in between.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Predicting drug-target interactions using matrix factorization with self-paced learning and dual similarity information.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lirong WangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Chao Ma
Peter Wipf
Haibin Liu
Weiwei Su
Xiang-Qun Xie

Funding

YEAST ER MOLECULAR CHAPERONE TRANSLOCATION: GENOME DATABANK HOMOLOGSP41RR006009 · NCRR · MELLON PITTS CORPORATION (MPC CORP) · PI BLOOD, PHILIP D · 1990 to 2011
$22.0M
University of Pittsburgh Center for Chemical DiversityP50GM067082 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WIPF, PETER · 2002 to 2012
$18.6M
Structure/Function of the CB2 Receptor Binding and G-protein Recognition PocketsR01DA025612 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI XIE, XIANG-QUN · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
Screen and Design p18 Chemical Probes for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Self-RenewalR21HL109654 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI XIE, XIANG-QUN · 2011 to 2012
$413k
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR006009NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL109654NHLBI NIH HHS R21HL109654NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025612NIDA NIH HHS R01DA025612NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM067082NIGMS NIH HHS P50-GM067082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Target identification of the known bioactive compounds and novel synthetic analogs is a very important research field in medicinal chemistry, biochemistry, and pharmacology. It is also a challenging and costly step towards chemical biology and phenotypic screening. In silico identification of potential biological targets for chemical compounds offers an alternative avenue for the exploration of ligand-target interactions and biochemical mechanisms, as well as for investigation of drug repurposing. Computational target fishing mines biologically annotated chemical databases and then maps compound structures into chemogenomical space in order to predict the biological targets. We summarize the recent advances and applications in computational target fishing, such as chemical similarity searching, data mining/machine learning, panel docking, and the bioactivity spectral analysis for target identification. We then described in detail a new web-based target prediction tool, TargetHunter (http://www.cbligand.org/TargetHunter). This web portal implements a novel in silico target prediction algorithm, the Targets Associated with its MOst SImilar Counterparts, by exploring the largest chemogenomical databases, ChEMBL. Prediction accuracy reached 91.1% from the top 3 guesses on a subset of high-potency compounds from the ChEMBL database, which outperformed a published algorithm, multiple-category models. TargetHunter also features an embedded geography tool, BioassayGeoMap, developed to allow the user easily to search for potential collaborators that can experimentally validate the predicted biological target(s) or off target(s). TargetHunter therefore provides a promising alternative to bridge the knowledge gap between biology and chemistry, and significantly boost the productivity of chemogenomics researchers for in silico drug design and discovery.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDatabases, ChemicalModels, MolecularSoftwareAlgorithmsAnti-HIV AgentsAntihypertensive AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsArtificial IntelligenceBenzofuransComputer GraphicsData MiningDrug DiscoveryDrug RepositioningMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular StructureAnti-HIV AgentsAntihypertensive AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsBenzofuransdarifenacinMuscarinic AntagonistsPolythiazidePyrrolidines

Identifiers

PMID23292636
PMCPMC3675739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.