Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23292304›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2013

Service user and family carer involvement in mental health care: divergent views.

Else Tambuyzer, Chantal Van Audenhove

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 'Triadic' shared decision making in mental health: Experiences and expectations of service users, caregivers and clinicians in Germany.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Is perceived patient involvement in mental health care associated with satisfaction and empowerment?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Else TambuyzerLUCAS, Centre for Care Research and Consultancy, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 39, PB 5310, 3000, Leuven, Belgium, else.tambuyzer@gmail.com.
Chantal Van Audenhove

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed differences between service users', family carers' and mental healthcare providers' perceptions on service user and family carer involvement in mental healthcare. We conducted questionnaires in care networks for persons with serious and persistent mental illness, among 111 service users, 73 family carers and 216 mental healthcare providers. Many aspects of service user and family carer involvement are achieved to satisfactory levels while other aspects are scarcely realized. Service users and mental healthcare providers perceive family carer involvement as less important and realized than service user involvement. Family carers hold more favorable views on the importance and realization of involvement than do mental healthcare providers. The implementation of stakeholders' involvement in healthcare is ongoing. Notwithstanding great efforts, service users' and family carers' involvement preferences are not yet fully considered. Developing procedures, training and monitoring cycles regarding involvement may enhance this situation.

Indexed as

CaregiversAdolescentAdultAgedAttitude to HealthFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.