Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23292282›Full record

ArticleMolecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.)2013

Research resource: nuclear receptors as transcriptome: discriminant and prognostic value in breast cancer.

George E O Muscat, Natalie A Eriksson, Karen Byth, Sherene Loi, Dinny Graham, Shalini Jindal, Melissa J Davis, Colin Clyne, John W Funder, Evan R Simpson and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

George E O MuscatInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia. G.Muscat@uq.edu.au
Natalie A Eriksson
Karen Byth
Sherene Loi
Dinny Graham
Shalini Jindal
Melissa J Davis
Colin Clyne
John W Funder
Evan R Simpson
Mark A Ragan
Elizabeth Kuczek
Peter J Fuller
Wayne D Tilley
Peter J Leedman
Christine L Clarke
University of Sydney · AUMonash Institute of Medical Research · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUHanson Institute · AUHarry Perkins Institute of Medical Research · AUInstitut Jules Bordet · BEMonash University · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AUWestmead Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify biologically relevant groupings or clusters of nuclear receptors (NR) that are associated with breast neoplasia, with potentially diagnostic, discriminant or prognostic value, we quantitated mRNA expression levels of all 48 members of the human NR superfamily by TaqMan low-density array analysis in 116 curated breast tissue samples, including pre- and postmenopausal normal breast and both ERα(+) and ERα(-) tumor tissue. In addition, we have determined NR levels in independent cohorts of tamoxifen-treated ERα(+) and ERα(-) tissue samples. There were differences in relative NR mRNA expression between neoplastic and normal breast, and between ER(+) and ER(-) tumors. First, there is overexpression of the NUR77 subgroup and EAR2 in neoplastic breast. Second, we identify a signature of five NR (ERα, EAR2, NUR77, TRα, and RARγ) that classifies breast samples with more than 97% cross-validated accuracy into normal or cancer classes. Third, we find a novel negative association between five NR (TRβ, NUR77, RORγ, COUP-TFII, and LRH1) and histological grade. Finally, four NR (COUP-TFII, TRβ, PPARγ, and MR) are significant predictors of metastasis-free survival in tamoxifen-treated breast cancers, independent of ER expression. The present study highlights the discriminant and prognostic value of NR in breast cancer; identifies novel, clinically relevant, NR signatures; and highlights NR signaling pathways with potential roles in breast cancer pathophysiology and as new therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, DuctalCOUP Transcription Factor IIEosinophil Cationic ProteinFemaleGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, erbAHumansNuclear Receptor Subfamily 4, Group A, Member 1PPAR gammaPrognosisReceptors, AndrogenReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearBiomarkers, TumorCOUP Transcription Factor IIEosinophil Cationic ProteinNR2F2 protein, humanNR4A1 protein, humanNuclear Receptor Subfamily 4, Group A, Member 1PPAR gammaReceptors, AndrogenReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRNA, MessengerTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID23292282
PMCPMC5417325
OpenAlexW2105069705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.