SynthesisHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2013
Do the quality of the trials and the year of publication affect the efficacy of intervention to improve seasonal influenza vaccination among healthcare workers?: Results of a systematic review.
Synthesis in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A cross-sectional survey of general practitioners' influenza vaccination willingness and influencing factors based on the reasoned action approach.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Influenza vaccination coverage among health-care workers during the COVID-19 epidemic in 2020/2021 influenza season: Evidence from a web-based survey in northwestern China.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- Flu Vaccination among Healthcare Professionals in Times of COVID-19: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior.Vaccines · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Seasonal influenza vaccination among health-care workers: the impact of different tailored programs in four University hospitals in Rome.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020Article
- Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2019Article
- Influenza vaccination in healthcare workers: A comprehensive critical appraisal of the literature.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018Review
- Knowledge, Attitude and Behaviours towards Recommended Vaccinations among Healthcare Workers.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination in Hematological Malignancies: a Systematic Review of Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Safety.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite longstanding recommendations by public-health authorities vaccination coverage in health care workers worldwide are poor. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the trials conducted to increase seasonal influenza vaccination rates among health care workers.
resultsTen articles met the pre-determined criteria. For all article the score calculation was performed. DISCUSSION: The combination of an educational and a promotional element appared the most effective in augmenting the influenza vaccination coverage among health care workers. But some cases, the intervention did not contribute to increasing the vaccination rates among health care workers. In any case, the quality of controlled trials plays an important role in the results obtained by carrying out a specific intervention and contributed to obtaining this debatable results. MATERIALS AND
methodsResearch was conducted using Scopus and PubMed database. We selected all clinical trials to perform the meta-analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.