Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23291941›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2013

Recommendations for tick-borne encephalitis vaccination from the Central European Vaccination Awareness Group (CEVAG).

Dace Zavadska, Ioana Anca, Francis André, Mustafa Bakir, Roman Chlibek, Milan Cižman, Inga Ivaskeviciene, Atanas Mangarov, Zsófia Mészner, Marko Pokorn and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Tick-induced neurological disorders.Journal of neurology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Food-Borne Transmission of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus-Spread, Consequences, and Prophylaxis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  17. Burden of Tick-Borne Encephalitis, Sweden.Emerging infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 16 institutions in 17 countries.

Dace ZavadskaDepartment of Pediatrics; Riga Stradins University; Riga, Latvia.
Ioana Anca
Francis André
Mustafa Bakir
Roman Chlibek
Milan Cižman
Inga Ivaskeviciene
Atanas Mangarov
Zsófia Mészner
Marko Pokorn
Roman Prymula
Darko Richter
Nuran Salman
Pavol Simurka
Eda Tamm
Goran Tešović
Ingrid Urbancikova
Vytautas Usonis
Ljubljana University Medical Centre · SIVilnius University · LTInstitute of Child and Mother Health · BDIstanbul University · TRKosair Children's Hospital · USMarmara University · TRMilitary University · RUNational Center of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases · BGNational Institute of Child Health · HUNemours Children’s Clinic · USRiga Stradiņš University · LVStatistics Belgium · BETartu University Hospital · EEUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRUniversity of Defence · CZUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a viral neurological zoonotic disease transmitted to humans by ticks or by consumption of unpasteurized dairy products from infected cows, goats, or sheep. TBE is highly endemic in areas of Central and Eastern Europe and Russia where it is a major public health concern. However, it is difficult to diagnose TBE as clinical manifestations tend to be relatively nonspecific and a standardized case definition does not exist across the region. TBE is becoming more important in Europe due to the appearance of new endemic areas. Few Central European Vaccination Awareness Group (CEVAG) member countries have implemented universal vaccination programmes against TBE and vaccination coverage is not considered sufficient to control the disease. When implemented, immunization strategies only apply to risk groups under certain conditions, with no harmonized recommendations available to date across the region. Effective vaccination programmes are essential in preventing the burden of TBE. This review examines the current situation of TBE in CEVAG countries and contains recommendations for the vaccination of children and high-risk groups. For countries at very high risk of TBE infections, CEVAG strongly recommends the introduction of universal TBE vaccination in children > 1 y of age onwards. For countries with a very low risk of TBE, recommendations should only apply to those traveling to endemic areas. Overall, it is generally accepted that each country should be free to make its own decision based on regional epidemiological data and the vaccination calendar, although recommendations should be made, especially for those living in endemic areas.

Indexed as

Endemic DiseasesEncephalitis, Tick-BorneEurope, EasternHumansVaccinationViral VaccinesViral VaccinesCentral EuropeCEVAGrecommendationsTBE vaccinationtick-borne encephalitis

Identifiers

PMID23291941
PMCPMC3859759
OpenAlexW2023846583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.