Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23291599›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation2013

Functional outcomes of persons who underwent dysvascular lower extremity amputations: effect of postacute rehabilitation setting.

Carley N Sauter, Liliana E Pezzin, Timothy R Dillingham

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Lower extremity amputation protocol: a pilot enhanced recovery pathway for vascular amputees.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2022
    Article
  5. Clinical Outcome of Transfemoral Direct Socket Interface (Part 2).Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Advancing Innovation in Skilled Nursing Facilities through Academic Collaborations.Physical therapy journal of policy, administration, and leadership · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carley N SauterDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Liliana E Pezzin
Timothy R Dillingham

Funding

DYSVASCULAR AMPUTEES: REHABILITATION USE AND OUTCOMESR01HD036414 · NICHD · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI DILLINGHAM, TIMOTHY R · 2001 to 2004
$531k
DYSVASCULAR AMPUTEES: REHABILITATION USE AND OUTCOMESR29HD036414 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DILLINGHAM, TIMOTHY R · 1998 to 2001
$180k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD036414NICHD NIH HHS R01HD36414NICHD NIH HHS R29 HD036414NICHD NIH HHS R29HD36414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the effect of postacute rehabilitation setting on functional outcomes among patients who underwent major dysvascular lower extremity amputations.

designThis is a population-based prospective cohort study conducted in Maryland and Wisconsin. Data collected from medical records and patient interviews conducted during acute hospitalization after amputation and at 6 mos after the acute care discharge were analyzed using multivariate models and instrumental variable techniques.

resultsA total of 297 patients were analyzed on the basis of postacute care rehabilitation setting: acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF), skilled nursing facility (SNF), or home. The majority (43.4%) received care in an IRF; 32%, in an SNF; and 24.6%, at home. On the Short Form-36 subscales, significantly improved outcomes were observed for the patients receiving postacute care at an IRF relative to those cared for at an SNF in physical function, role physical, and physical component summary score. Patients receiving postacute care in IRFs also experienced better role physical and physical component summary score outcomes compared with those discharged directly home. In addition, patients receiving postacute care in an IRF were significantly more likely to score in the top quartile for general health in IRF compared with SNF or home and less likely to score in the lowest quartile for physical function, role physical, and physical component summary score in IRF compared with SNF. Lower activity of daily living impairment was observed in IRF compared with SNF.

conclusionsAmong this large and diverse cohort of patients who underwent major dysvascular lower limb amputations, receipt of interdisciplinary rehabilitation services in an IRF yielded improved functional outcomes 6 mos after amputation relative to care received in SNFs or at home.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsOutcome Assessment, Health CareRehabilitation CentersActivities of Daily LivingAmputation, SurgicalHumansLower ExtremityMultivariate AnalysisSkilled Nursing FacilitiesTreatment OutcomeVascular Diseases

Identifiers

PMID23291599
PMCPMC3604129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.