Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23291159›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2013

Age-dependent effects of repeated amphetamine exposure on working memory in rats.

Luke K Sherrill, Jessica J Stanis, Joshua M Gulley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Peri-adolescent exposure to (meth)amphetamine in animal models.International review of neurobiology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luke K SherrillDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Jessica J Stanis
Joshua M Gulley
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Mechanisms of amphetamine-induced plasticity in adolescents compared to adultsR01DA029815 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI GULLEY, JOSHUA M · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive dysfunction is a hallmark of chronic psychostimulant misuse. Adolescents may have heightened risk of developing drug-induced deficits because their brains are already undergoing widespread changes in anatomy and function as a normal part of development. To address this hypothesis, we performed two sets of experiments where adolescent and young adult rats were pre-exposed to saline or amphetamine (1 or 3mg/kg) and subsequently tested in a prefrontal cortex (PFC)-sensitive working memory task. A total of ten injections of AMPH or saline (in control rats) were given every other day over the course of 19 days. After rats reached adulthood (>90 days old), cognitive performance was assessed using operant-based delayed matching-to-position (DMTP) and delayed nonmatching-to-position (DNMTP) tasks. DNMTP was also assessed following challenges with amphetamine (0.3-1.25mg/kg), and ketamine (5.0-10mg/kg). In experiment one, we also measured the locomotor response following the first and tenth pre-exposure to amphetamine and after an amphetamine challenge given at the conclusion of operant testing. Compared to adult-exposed groups, adolescents were less sensitive to the psychomotor effects of amphetamine. However, they were more vulnerable to exposure-induced cognitive impairments. For example, adolescent-exposed rats displayed delay-dependent deficits in accuracy, increased sensitivity to proactive interference, and required more training to reach criterion. Drug challenges produced deficits in DNMTP performance, but these were not dependent on pre-exposure group. These studies demonstrate age of exposure-dependent effects of amphetamine on cognition in a PFC-sensitive task, suggesting a heightened sensitivity of adolescents to amphetamine-induced neuroplasticity.

Indexed as

AgingAmphetamineAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsCentral Nervous System StimulantsConditioning, OperantDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFemaleFood DeprivationKetamineMaleMemory, Short-TermMotor ActivityRatsAmphetamineCentral Nervous System StimulantsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsKetamine

Identifiers

PMID23291159
PMCPMC3566264
OpenAlexW2131135103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.