ReviewTrends in cardiovascular medicine2013
Improving outcomes after cardiac arrest using NO inhalation.
Review in Trends in cardiovascular medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of blood nitric oxide level in predicting return of spontaneous circulation: a prospective case-control study.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024Article
- A randomized and blinded trial of inhaled nitric oxide in a piglet model of pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Resuscitation · 2021Article
- Pulmonary Vasodilator Therapy in Shock-associated Cardiac Arrest.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2018Article
- Hydrogen sulfide, nitric oxide, and neurodegenerative disorders.Translational neurodegeneration · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite advances in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) methods including therapeutic hypothermia (TH), long-term neurological outcomes and survival after sudden cardiac arrest (CA) remains to be dismal. While nitric oxide (NO) prevents organ injury induced by ischemia and reperfusion (I/R), systemic vasodilation induced by intravenous NO-donor compounds typically precludes its use in post-CA patients in whom blood pressure is often low and unstable. Although developed as a selective pulmonary vasodilator, inhaled NO has systemic benefits in a variety of pre-clinical and clinical studies without causing potentially harmful systemic vasodilation. Breathing NO after CPR may prevent post-CA brain injury and improve long-term outcomes after CA and CPR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.