Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23288467›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2013

Prognostic value of NT-pro-BNP and hs-CRP for risk stratification in primary care: results from the population-based DETECT study.

David M Leistner, Jens Klotsche, Lars Pieper, Sylvia Palm, Günter K Stalla, Hendrik Lehnert, Sigmund Silber, Winfried März, Hans-Ulrich Wittchen, Andreas M Zeiher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Major adverse cardiovascular events in older emergency department patients presenting with non-cardiac medical complaints.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2022
    Article
  5. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The value of noncoronary atherosclerosis for identifying coronary artery disease: results of the Leipzig LIFE Heart Study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2016
    Article
  13. Long-term changes in renal function and perfusion in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2016
    Article
  14. Heart rate turbulence and deceleration capacity for risk prediction of serious arrhythmic events in Marfan syndrome.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2015
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Improvement of risk assessment in systemic light-chain amyloidosis using human placental growth factor.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2015
    Article
  18. Clinical significance of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an overview of current evidence.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David M LeistnerDepartment of Medicine III Cardiology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor Stern-Kai. 7, 60590 Frankfurt/Main, Germany. David.Leistner@kgu.de
Jens Klotsche
Lars Pieper
Sylvia Palm
Günter K Stalla
Hendrik Lehnert
Sigmund Silber
Winfried März
Hans-Ulrich Wittchen
Andreas M Zeiher

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is continuous debate to the use of biomarkers in the general practitioners office and to what degree the established biomarkers N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) and high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) might contribute to improved prediction of incident cardiovascular events.

objectiveTo evaluate the utility and 5-year predictive value of a single measurement of NT-pro-BNP and hs-CRP for incident cardiovascular events, and its added value beyond the contribution of conventional risk factors in primary care.

methodsFive year prospective longitudinal clinical epidemiological study in a nationwide sample of 4,775 primary care subjects (mean age 55.8 years, 62 % women) without coronary artery disease at baseline. Main outcome measures were incident major cardiovascular events and all-cause death.

resultsDuring the 5 years of follow-up, 188 subjects (3.9 %) died or experienced a first major cardiovascular event. The addition of NT-pro-BNP, but not of hs-CRP to a prediction model with established cardiovascular risk factors improved the prediction of major cardiovascular events (increase in C statistic by 0.009; p = 0.008), and was associated with a significant improvement in net reclassification improvement (NRI = 23.6 %; p = 0.003).

conclusionIn a primary care setting, one single measurement of NT-pro-BNP, but not of hs-CRP significantly improves the prediction of incident cardiovascular events.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesC-Reactive ProteinFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNatriuretic Peptide, BrainOutcome Assessment, Health CarePeptide FragmentsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.